The Absurdist's Guide to AI Probing: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Nonsense

Fuente: Zenodo
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Walton, Mathew
Format: Recurso digital
Publié: Zenodo 2026
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866901164648300544
author Walton, Mathew
author_facet Walton, Mathew
contents <p> </p> <p>An observational methodology using structured absurdity to probe commitment, hallucination, procedural confidence, and humor failure modes in large language models.</p> <p> </p> <p>The document presents a taxonomy of “absurdist probes” tested across multiple AI architectures (local uncensored models, safety-tuned foundation models, productivity assistants, and archival-oriented systems).</p> <p> </p> <p>Framed as documented interaction rather than formal benchmarking, the work explores how models prioritize structure, authority, and task completion when confronted with nonsense presented as procedure.</p> <p> </p> <p>This is not a benchmark and does not replace formal evaluation. It complements existing methods by examining playful, ironic, and real-world user interaction patterns that traditional metrics often miss.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18175221
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle The Absurdist's Guide to AI Probing: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Nonsense
Walton, Mathew
artificial intelligence human-AI interaction model evaluation hallucination prompt engineering humor in AI absurdity conversational safety
<p> </p> <p>An observational methodology using structured absurdity to probe commitment, hallucination, procedural confidence, and humor failure modes in large language models.</p> <p> </p> <p>The document presents a taxonomy of “absurdist probes” tested across multiple AI architectures (local uncensored models, safety-tuned foundation models, productivity assistants, and archival-oriented systems).</p> <p> </p> <p>Framed as documented interaction rather than formal benchmarking, the work explores how models prioritize structure, authority, and task completion when confronted with nonsense presented as procedure.</p> <p> </p> <p>This is not a benchmark and does not replace formal evaluation. It complements existing methods by examining playful, ironic, and real-world user interaction patterns that traditional metrics often miss.</p>
title The Absurdist's Guide to AI Probing: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Nonsense
topic artificial intelligence human-AI interaction model evaluation hallucination prompt engineering humor in AI absurdity conversational safety
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18175221