Stability–Advancement: A Structural Determination for Civilizational Governance Under Fast-Cycle Conditions (CSASD)
Fuente:
Zenodo
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866901854359650304 |
|---|---|
| author | Zhan, Dedong |
| author_facet | Zhan, Dedong |
| contents | <p>The validity of CSASD is assessed solely by the closure of non-bypassable boundary conditions.<br>Its function is to specify the existential, pre-operational determination of whether a civilizational system can continue operating under fast-cycle regimes, not to advance any form of implementation.<br>To prevent inertia-driven misreadings under legacy coordinates, the following interpretations are explicitly excluded:<br>CSASD ≠ policy or institutional design; ≠ engineering or implementation framework; ≠ feasibility analyzer; ≠ methodological tool or argumentative survey.</p> <p>These interpretations are invalid within the structure defined herein.<br>The “CSASD” in this paper is not CSASD under any legacy reading.<br>Here, CSASD may only and exclusively be equivalently stated as:<br>existential structural preconditions for civilizational continuation under fast-cycle regimes.<br>CSASD does not rely on long-horizon prediction or a single objective function. Centered on structural viability, it outputs: system state (stable / pseudo-stable / unstable), operating mode (advance-capable / stability-only / reset-required), four gate criteria (G1 closure of power–responsibility–benefit; G2 cost attribution and settleability; G3 endogenous consensus; G4 structural viability), and the existence of transition channels (Channel). The formulation is intended to place seemingly “unsolvable governance problems” into a decidable frame, shifting discourse from narrative dispute to structural conditions, channel construction, and settlement mechanisms; it is intentionally non-prescriptive and non-design-oriented, serving solely as a structural determination of viability conditions rather than a proposal for implementation.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18213954 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Stability–Advancement: A Structural Determination for Civilizational Governance Under Fast-Cycle Conditions (CSASD) Zhan, Dedong <p>The validity of CSASD is assessed solely by the closure of non-bypassable boundary conditions.<br>Its function is to specify the existential, pre-operational determination of whether a civilizational system can continue operating under fast-cycle regimes, not to advance any form of implementation.<br>To prevent inertia-driven misreadings under legacy coordinates, the following interpretations are explicitly excluded:<br>CSASD ≠ policy or institutional design; ≠ engineering or implementation framework; ≠ feasibility analyzer; ≠ methodological tool or argumentative survey.</p> <p>These interpretations are invalid within the structure defined herein.<br>The “CSASD” in this paper is not CSASD under any legacy reading.<br>Here, CSASD may only and exclusively be equivalently stated as:<br>existential structural preconditions for civilizational continuation under fast-cycle regimes.<br>CSASD does not rely on long-horizon prediction or a single objective function. Centered on structural viability, it outputs: system state (stable / pseudo-stable / unstable), operating mode (advance-capable / stability-only / reset-required), four gate criteria (G1 closure of power–responsibility–benefit; G2 cost attribution and settleability; G3 endogenous consensus; G4 structural viability), and the existence of transition channels (Channel). The formulation is intended to place seemingly “unsolvable governance problems” into a decidable frame, shifting discourse from narrative dispute to structural conditions, channel construction, and settlement mechanisms; it is intentionally non-prescriptive and non-design-oriented, serving solely as a structural determination of viability conditions rather than a proposal for implementation.</p> |
| title | Stability–Advancement: A Structural Determination for Civilizational Governance Under Fast-Cycle Conditions (CSASD) |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18213954 |