Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18215367 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- <p>The emergence of complex multicellular life requires not only stable biological identity but the capacity to reconstruct that identity across collapse, division, and generations. This paper addresses how such <strong>replayable biological organisation</strong> becomes possible within a regulation-first framework.</p> <p>We introduce an architectural separation between <strong>runtime control</strong>, which maintains viability within a boundary-defined basin, and <strong>inert reconstruction archives</strong>, which constrain how that basin can be rebuilt after disruption. DNA is treated not as an executive controller but as a chemically stable archive whose function is realised only through boundary-dependent execution.</p> <p>Within this framework, embryogenesis is reframed as <strong>staged basin replay</strong> rather than organismal construction. Early cleavage subdivides internal compartments without fragmenting identity, while subsequent development reflects context-dependent execution within a persistent, boundary-dominant basin. We further formalise <strong>boundary dominance</strong> as a necessary condition for stable integration and apply this principle to sexual reproduction, interpreting fertilisation as controlled archive transfer under resolved dominance rather than fusion of equal organisms.</p> <p>Differentiation is shown to require continuous stabilisation to prevent execution drift, dovetailing with kinetic anchoring mechanisms previously identified in multicellular systems. Together, these results unify development, sex, and inheritance under a single control-theoretic architecture grounded in boundary-defined identity.</p> <p>This paper completes a sequence of companion works developing a regulation-first, boundary-centric framework for biological identity, persistence, and complexity.</p> <p>This paper is <strong>Companion Paper 5</strong> in a series developing a regulation-first, boundary-centric framework for biological identity.</p> <p> </p> <h3><strong>Life as a Phase Transition — Series Overview</strong></h3> <p><strong>Foundational framework</strong></p> <p><strong> A. An Architectural Origin of Organismal Unity<br></strong><em>Foundational Paper<br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18305134">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18305134</a><br></em></p> <p><strong> B. </strong><strong>Life as a Phase Transition</strong><br><em>Foundational Paper</em><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18176157" target="_new">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18176157</a><br>→ Defines life as a maintained, non-equilibrium basin governed by regulation and boundary constraints.</p> <p><strong>Heredity constraint and theory closure</strong></p> <p><strong> C. </strong><strong>The Analogue Heredity Ceiling and the Basin Digitisation Transition</strong><br><em>Heredity constraint framework</em><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18250555">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18250555</a><br>→ Formalises the limit of compositional (analogue) heredity and explains why replayable archives (digitisation) become unavoidable within the life-as-a-phase-transition framework.</p> <p><strong>Companion papers — Mechanisms and consequences</strong></p> <p><strong> 2. </strong><strong>The Basin of Identity: microRNA as a Kinetic Anchor in Multicellular Dynamics</strong><br> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18181118" target="_new">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18181118</a><br> → Explores how kinetic anchoring mechanisms stabilise basin identity in multicellular systems, now interpretable as local management of identity dimensionality and heritability stress.</p> <p><strong>3.Boundary Shedding as Basin Maintenance</strong><br><em>A Control-Theoretic Extension of Life as a Phase Transition</em><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18215113" target="_new">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18215113</a><br>→ Describes boundary shedding as a regulatory strategy for maintaining basin coherence under stress.</p> <p><strong>4.Cohesive Membranes and the Emergence of Multicellular Basin Identity</strong><br><em>When Many Compartments Become One Organism</em><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18215283" target="_new">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18215283</a><br>→ Examines how multicellular organisation emerges from coupled boundary systems and shared basin identity.</p> <p><strong>5. From Control to Replay</strong><br><em>Archives, Development, and Sexual Reproduction in Boundary-Defined Life</em><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18215367" target="_new">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18215367</a><br>→ Investigates replay, development, and sexual reproduction as stabilising mechanisms, now unified by the Basin Digitisation Transition.</p> <p><strong>6. Boundary Architecture and Failure in Living Systems</strong><br><em>A regulation-first classification of biological form</em><br><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18226987" target="_new">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18226987</a><br>→ Classifies biological form and failure modes through boundary architecture and regulatory breakdown.</p> <p><strong>7.The Boundary Renewal Principle:<br></strong><em>An Architectural Account of Heredity and Evoluti</em><strong>on<br></strong><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18335521">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18335521</a></p>