Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mousel, John
Format: Recurso digital
Language:
Published: Zenodo 2026
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18225622
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866901169052319744
author Mousel, John
author_facet Mousel, John
contents <p>This paper clarifies the role of the KN stabilizer field in KN-stabilized Yang–Mills constructions by formulating it explicitly at the level of the action. Two consistent interpretations are presented: an auxiliary-field formulation, in which the stabilizer acts as a non-propagating constraint, and a dynamical formulation, in which the stabilizer is treated as a massive field whose effects decouple in the infrared.</p> <p> </p> <p>In both cases, the theory admits a well-defined infrared limit in which an effective Abelian U(1) gauge sector emerges without the introduction of explicit ultraviolet cutoffs or ad hoc truncation. The emergence of electromagnetism is shown to follow from standard effective field theory mechanisms—either through controlled sectoral reduction or dynamical decoupling—rather than from spontaneous symmetry breaking, although symmetry-breaking extensions are briefly outlined.</p> <p> </p> <p>The primary purpose of this work is conceptual clarification. It resolves ambiguities present in earlier formulations regarding the dynamical status of the stabilizer field and the origin of the effective Abelian sector. As such, it is intended to serve both as a response to technical critiques and as a reference point guiding future development of the KN-stabilized framework, including potential symmetry-breaking dynamics, spectrum analysis, and quantum corrections.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18225622
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle On the Dynamical Status of the KN Stabilizer Field and Emergent Abelian Sectors
Mousel, John
<p>This paper clarifies the role of the KN stabilizer field in KN-stabilized Yang–Mills constructions by formulating it explicitly at the level of the action. Two consistent interpretations are presented: an auxiliary-field formulation, in which the stabilizer acts as a non-propagating constraint, and a dynamical formulation, in which the stabilizer is treated as a massive field whose effects decouple in the infrared.</p> <p> </p> <p>In both cases, the theory admits a well-defined infrared limit in which an effective Abelian U(1) gauge sector emerges without the introduction of explicit ultraviolet cutoffs or ad hoc truncation. The emergence of electromagnetism is shown to follow from standard effective field theory mechanisms—either through controlled sectoral reduction or dynamical decoupling—rather than from spontaneous symmetry breaking, although symmetry-breaking extensions are briefly outlined.</p> <p> </p> <p>The primary purpose of this work is conceptual clarification. It resolves ambiguities present in earlier formulations regarding the dynamical status of the stabilizer field and the origin of the effective Abelian sector. As such, it is intended to serve both as a response to technical critiques and as a reference point guiding future development of the KN-stabilized framework, including potential symmetry-breaking dynamics, spectrum analysis, and quantum corrections.</p>
title On the Dynamical Status of the KN Stabilizer Field and Emergent Abelian Sectors
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18225622