STRUCTURING INVESTMENT MODELS FOR NIGERIA'S CONFLICT-AFFECTED REGIONS TO INTEGRATE SECURITY, LIVELIHOODS, AND ECONOMIC STABILIZATION AT NATIONAL SCALE
Fuente:
Zenodo
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2019
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866901641559539712 |
|---|---|
| author | Ogbe Michael Abimbola |
| author_facet | Ogbe Michael Abimbola |
| contents | <p><a href="https://ijetrm.com/issues/files/Jan-2019-21-1768996887-DEC0201925.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Conflict-affected regions present</a> one of the most persistent constraints to inclusive economic development,<br>particularly in fragile states where insecurity, unemployment, and weak institutions reinforce cycles of poverty<br>and instability. Nigeria exemplifies this challenge at scale, with protracted conflicts disrupting agricultural<br>production, infrastructure investment, and private capital flows across several regions. At a macro level,<br>sustainable recovery in such contexts requires investment frameworks that move beyond short-term humanitarian<br>responses and instead align security objectives with livelihood creation and long-term economic stabilization.<br>This study positions integrated investment models as critical instruments for translating national development<br>priorities into locally resilient economic systems. Drawing on development finance, security economics, and<br>impact investment theory, the paper conceptualizes a multi-layered investment architecture capable of operating<br>under elevated risk conditions. It emphasizes blended finance structures, public–private risk-sharing mechanisms,<br>and performance-linked financing that internalize security externalities while crowding in private capital. At the<br>national scale, these models are framed to align with fiscal planning, decentralization policies, and sectoral<br>strategies in agriculture, energy, and small-scale manufacturing, ensuring coherence between regional<br>interventions and macroeconomic stabilization goals. The analysis then narrows to Nigeria’s conflict-affected<br>regions, proposing adaptive investment vehicles that integrate security provisioning, community-based<br>livelihoods, and market access within a single financial logic. Mechanisms such as security-backed guarantees,<br>local enterprise aggregation platforms, and outcomes-based funding are examined for their capacity to stabilize<br>incomes, reduce conflict incentives, and rebuild investor confidence. By structurally linking security outcomes to<br>economic returns, the proposed framework offers a scalable pathway for transforming fragile regions into<br>contributors to national growth, fiscal resilience, and social cohesion. Policy relevance is highlighted through<br>governance alignment, transparency safeguards, and impact indicators.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18227462 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | STRUCTURING INVESTMENT MODELS FOR NIGERIA'S CONFLICT-AFFECTED REGIONS TO INTEGRATE SECURITY, LIVELIHOODS, AND ECONOMIC STABILIZATION AT NATIONAL SCALE Ogbe Michael Abimbola Conflict-affected regions; Blended finance; Security–development nexus; Livelihoods; Economic stabilization; Nigeria <p><a href="https://ijetrm.com/issues/files/Jan-2019-21-1768996887-DEC0201925.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Conflict-affected regions present</a> one of the most persistent constraints to inclusive economic development,<br>particularly in fragile states where insecurity, unemployment, and weak institutions reinforce cycles of poverty<br>and instability. Nigeria exemplifies this challenge at scale, with protracted conflicts disrupting agricultural<br>production, infrastructure investment, and private capital flows across several regions. At a macro level,<br>sustainable recovery in such contexts requires investment frameworks that move beyond short-term humanitarian<br>responses and instead align security objectives with livelihood creation and long-term economic stabilization.<br>This study positions integrated investment models as critical instruments for translating national development<br>priorities into locally resilient economic systems. Drawing on development finance, security economics, and<br>impact investment theory, the paper conceptualizes a multi-layered investment architecture capable of operating<br>under elevated risk conditions. It emphasizes blended finance structures, public–private risk-sharing mechanisms,<br>and performance-linked financing that internalize security externalities while crowding in private capital. At the<br>national scale, these models are framed to align with fiscal planning, decentralization policies, and sectoral<br>strategies in agriculture, energy, and small-scale manufacturing, ensuring coherence between regional<br>interventions and macroeconomic stabilization goals. The analysis then narrows to Nigeria’s conflict-affected<br>regions, proposing adaptive investment vehicles that integrate security provisioning, community-based<br>livelihoods, and market access within a single financial logic. Mechanisms such as security-backed guarantees,<br>local enterprise aggregation platforms, and outcomes-based funding are examined for their capacity to stabilize<br>incomes, reduce conflict incentives, and rebuild investor confidence. By structurally linking security outcomes to<br>economic returns, the proposed framework offers a scalable pathway for transforming fragile regions into<br>contributors to national growth, fiscal resilience, and social cohesion. Policy relevance is highlighted through<br>governance alignment, transparency safeguards, and impact indicators.</p> |
| title | STRUCTURING INVESTMENT MODELS FOR NIGERIA'S CONFLICT-AFFECTED REGIONS TO INTEGRATE SECURITY, LIVELIHOODS, AND ECONOMIC STABILIZATION AT NATIONAL SCALE |
| topic | Conflict-affected regions; Blended finance; Security–development nexus; Livelihoods; Economic stabilization; Nigeria |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18227462 |