The Architecture of the Nightly Logout Sleep, Agency Suspension, and the Authorial Self in Simulation-Compatible Ontologies
Fuente:
Zenodo
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866901268272775168 |
|---|---|
| author | Collins, Guy |
| author_facet | Collins, Guy |
| contents | <p>Description</p> <p>Title: The Architecture of the Nightly Logout: Sleep, Agency Suspension, and the Authorial Self in Simulation-Compatible Ontologies</p> <p>Author: Guy Collins</p> <p>Date: 14 January 2026 <span> </span></p> <p>Summary</p> <p>This academic report reframes the universal phenomenon of sleep as a structural feature of selfhood that challenges classical assumptions about personal identity and agency. While typically viewed as a biological necessity, sleep reveals that agency is not a fundamental property of the self, but rather a contingent and revocable capability. During sleep, biological existence and experiential capacity (dreaming) persist, yet the subject loses authorial control over experience. <span> </span></p> <p>Key Arguments</p> <p>• The Permissions Model: The paper argues that sleep acts as a "nightly logout," where the right to author experience is withdrawn while the underlying system continues to run. Agency is interpreted as an operational "permissions interface" rather than an ontological constant. <span> </span></p> <p>• The Problem of the Gap: By examining John Locke’s memory-based identity and Derek Parfit’s psychological continuity, the author proposes a "succession model" of the self. In this view, each waking self is a newly instantiated successor tied to previous versions by psychological chains. <span> </span></p> <p>• Simulation Compatibility: The report explores how this structure is maximally compatible with simulation-style ontologies. In such systems, sleep satisfies the computational needs for downtime, internal maintenance, and the isolation of exploratory processes (dreaming) from environmental impact. <span> </span></p> <p>• Ethical Implications: Collins argues that if agency is conditional, moral responsibility must be "temporally bounded," localizing meaning specifically within the windows of granted authorial control. <span> </span></p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Ultimately, the report suggests that sleep is not evidence of an illusion, but evidence of an architecture. It concludes that the self is not the engine of the world, but a temporary interface with "write access" granted by a broader generative system.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18238841 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | The Architecture of the Nightly Logout Sleep, Agency Suspension, and the Authorial Self in Simulation-Compatible Ontologies Collins, Guy Simulation Theory, Philosophy of Mind, Personal Identity, Agency, Phenomenology, Cognitive Architecture, John Locke, Derek Parfit, Metaphysics, Digital Physics, Authorial Self, Computational Ontology <p>Description</p> <p>Title: The Architecture of the Nightly Logout: Sleep, Agency Suspension, and the Authorial Self in Simulation-Compatible Ontologies</p> <p>Author: Guy Collins</p> <p>Date: 14 January 2026 <span> </span></p> <p>Summary</p> <p>This academic report reframes the universal phenomenon of sleep as a structural feature of selfhood that challenges classical assumptions about personal identity and agency. While typically viewed as a biological necessity, sleep reveals that agency is not a fundamental property of the self, but rather a contingent and revocable capability. During sleep, biological existence and experiential capacity (dreaming) persist, yet the subject loses authorial control over experience. <span> </span></p> <p>Key Arguments</p> <p>• The Permissions Model: The paper argues that sleep acts as a "nightly logout," where the right to author experience is withdrawn while the underlying system continues to run. Agency is interpreted as an operational "permissions interface" rather than an ontological constant. <span> </span></p> <p>• The Problem of the Gap: By examining John Locke’s memory-based identity and Derek Parfit’s psychological continuity, the author proposes a "succession model" of the self. In this view, each waking self is a newly instantiated successor tied to previous versions by psychological chains. <span> </span></p> <p>• Simulation Compatibility: The report explores how this structure is maximally compatible with simulation-style ontologies. In such systems, sleep satisfies the computational needs for downtime, internal maintenance, and the isolation of exploratory processes (dreaming) from environmental impact. <span> </span></p> <p>• Ethical Implications: Collins argues that if agency is conditional, moral responsibility must be "temporally bounded," localizing meaning specifically within the windows of granted authorial control. <span> </span></p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Ultimately, the report suggests that sleep is not evidence of an illusion, but evidence of an architecture. It concludes that the self is not the engine of the world, but a temporary interface with "write access" granted by a broader generative system.</p> |
| title | The Architecture of the Nightly Logout Sleep, Agency Suspension, and the Authorial Self in Simulation-Compatible Ontologies |
| topic | Simulation Theory, Philosophy of Mind, Personal Identity, Agency, Phenomenology, Cognitive Architecture, John Locke, Derek Parfit, Metaphysics, Digital Physics, Authorial Self, Computational Ontology |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18238841 |