A Language for Dynamic Medicine Why Disease as Process Requires a Different Way of Speaking

Fuente: Zenodo
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Domargård, Anita
Format: Recurso digital
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Zenodo 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866901812254081024
author Domargård, Anita
author_facet Domargård, Anita
contents <p>This paper is part of the Universal Resonance Model (URM) project and develops its linguistic and conceptual foundation. It argues that when disease is understood as a dynamic process—characterized by feedback, delay, instability, phase transitions, and loss of resilience—traditional medical language becomes insufficient.</p> <p>Built within the URM framework, the paper treats language as cognitive infrastructure: what clinicians and researchers can observe, analyze, and test depends on what they are able to say. It shows how dynamic clinical phenomena are routinely flattened by static terminology, leading to conceptual and methodological distortion.</p> <p>The text presents URM not only as a theory of disease dynamics but also as a project in building a language for dynamic medicine—a way of speaking that preserves motion, coupling, memory, and timing in clinical reasoning. A new medical theory, it argues, does not only need data; it needs a language capable of carrying what it sees.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18258995
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle A Language for Dynamic Medicine Why Disease as Process Requires a Different Way of Speaking
Domargård, Anita
Dynamic medicine
Systems dynamics
Medical language
Universal Resonance Model
Feedback loops
Instability
Phase transition
Resilience
Clinical timing
Disease as process
Medicine
Systems biology
Clinical methodology
Philosophy of science
Medical epistemology
Complex systems
Translational medicine
<p>This paper is part of the Universal Resonance Model (URM) project and develops its linguistic and conceptual foundation. It argues that when disease is understood as a dynamic process—characterized by feedback, delay, instability, phase transitions, and loss of resilience—traditional medical language becomes insufficient.</p> <p>Built within the URM framework, the paper treats language as cognitive infrastructure: what clinicians and researchers can observe, analyze, and test depends on what they are able to say. It shows how dynamic clinical phenomena are routinely flattened by static terminology, leading to conceptual and methodological distortion.</p> <p>The text presents URM not only as a theory of disease dynamics but also as a project in building a language for dynamic medicine—a way of speaking that preserves motion, coupling, memory, and timing in clinical reasoning. A new medical theory, it argues, does not only need data; it needs a language capable of carrying what it sees.</p>
title A Language for Dynamic Medicine Why Disease as Process Requires a Different Way of Speaking
topic Dynamic medicine
Systems dynamics
Medical language
Universal Resonance Model
Feedback loops
Instability
Phase transition
Resilience
Clinical timing
Disease as process
Medicine
Systems biology
Clinical methodology
Philosophy of science
Medical epistemology
Complex systems
Translational medicine
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18258995