Resonance Axes as Structural Constraints in Multidimensional Psychological Organization A Non-Typological Model of Emergent Human Resonance
Fuente:
Zenodo
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866901945894043648 |
|---|---|
| author | Chu Nguyễn Đức Dũng, Brandon Chu |
| author_facet | Chu Nguyễn Đức Dũng, Brandon Chu |
| contents | <p dir="ltr">Prevailing models of personality and individual difference rely primarily on typological classification or trait aggregation. While useful for descriptive and statistical purposes, such models often conflate observable behavioral patterns with underlying psychological organization, obscuring how coherence, adaptability, and meaning emerge across time. As a result, personality frameworks struggle to account for contextual variability, long-term development, and the felt sense of alignment commonly described as resonance.</p> <p dir="ltr">This paper introduces a Ten-Axis Resonance Framework, reconceptualizing individual variation as a set of structural constraints on psychological regulation rather than as personality traits, types, or identities. Each axis represents a stable constraint shaping how perception, affect, cognition, identity formation, relational coordination, and meaning-making operate within a multidimensional psychological architecture. Nine axes function as hardware-level constraints, while one axis—Control vs. Trust Bias—operates at the level of regulatory strategy, permitting synthesis under sufficient integration.</p> <p dir="ltr">Resonance is defined not as a categorical attribute or symbolic identity, but as an emergent frequency produced by coherent self-regulation across dimensions and time. This framework corresponds to what depth psychology historically referred to as archetypal organization, but is reframed here as non-symbolic, non-personified, and structurally emergent rather than mythological. Grounded in a multidimensional architectural model of psychological organization (Chu Nguyễn Đức Dũng, 2025), the resonance framework integrates insights from systems theory, attachment research, affective neuroscience, depth psychology, and phenomenology, offering a structurally precise alternative to typological personality models.</p> <div> <p>Permissions Notice<br>This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).</p> <p>Any use involving adaptation, modification, translation, educational deployment, therapeutic application, derivative modeling, or inclusion in external platforms beyond unchanged archival hosting requires explicit written permission from the author.</p> </div> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18264804 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Resonance Axes as Structural Constraints in Multidimensional Psychological Organization A Non-Typological Model of Emergent Human Resonance Chu Nguyễn Đức Dũng, Brandon Chu resonance psychological architecture systems psychology phenomenology depth psychology personality theory (critical) structural psychology meaning-making <p dir="ltr">Prevailing models of personality and individual difference rely primarily on typological classification or trait aggregation. While useful for descriptive and statistical purposes, such models often conflate observable behavioral patterns with underlying psychological organization, obscuring how coherence, adaptability, and meaning emerge across time. As a result, personality frameworks struggle to account for contextual variability, long-term development, and the felt sense of alignment commonly described as resonance.</p> <p dir="ltr">This paper introduces a Ten-Axis Resonance Framework, reconceptualizing individual variation as a set of structural constraints on psychological regulation rather than as personality traits, types, or identities. Each axis represents a stable constraint shaping how perception, affect, cognition, identity formation, relational coordination, and meaning-making operate within a multidimensional psychological architecture. Nine axes function as hardware-level constraints, while one axis—Control vs. Trust Bias—operates at the level of regulatory strategy, permitting synthesis under sufficient integration.</p> <p dir="ltr">Resonance is defined not as a categorical attribute or symbolic identity, but as an emergent frequency produced by coherent self-regulation across dimensions and time. This framework corresponds to what depth psychology historically referred to as archetypal organization, but is reframed here as non-symbolic, non-personified, and structurally emergent rather than mythological. Grounded in a multidimensional architectural model of psychological organization (Chu Nguyễn Đức Dũng, 2025), the resonance framework integrates insights from systems theory, attachment research, affective neuroscience, depth psychology, and phenomenology, offering a structurally precise alternative to typological personality models.</p> <div> <p>Permissions Notice<br>This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).</p> <p>Any use involving adaptation, modification, translation, educational deployment, therapeutic application, derivative modeling, or inclusion in external platforms beyond unchanged archival hosting requires explicit written permission from the author.</p> </div> |
| title | Resonance Axes as Structural Constraints in Multidimensional Psychological Organization A Non-Typological Model of Emergent Human Resonance |
| topic | resonance psychological architecture systems psychology phenomenology depth psychology personality theory (critical) structural psychology meaning-making |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18264804 |