Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18319831 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866901962468884480 |
|---|---|
| author | LACCEI |
| author_facet | LACCEI |
| contents | <p>This dataset contains the indicators and composite scores used to develop and apply a <strong>Capability Maturity Model (CMM)</strong> for assessing institutional innovation in engineering education. It includes data for <strong>58 engineering universities across the Americas</strong>, covering scientific publications, citations, patents, and international collaboration.</p> <p>Data were obtained from <strong>OpenAlex</strong> and <strong>Espacenet</strong>, normalized to ensure comparability across institutions, and aggregated into a composite maturity score (Q) ranging from 0 to 1. Each institution is classified into one of five maturity levels, from Initial to Optimized.</p> <p>The dataset supports comparative and reproducible analyses of research and innovation capacity in engineering universities and can be reused for longitudinal, regional, or sector-specific studies.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18319831 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | From Capability Index to Maturity Model: Institutional Strategies for Innovation in Engineering Education LACCEI <p>This dataset contains the indicators and composite scores used to develop and apply a <strong>Capability Maturity Model (CMM)</strong> for assessing institutional innovation in engineering education. It includes data for <strong>58 engineering universities across the Americas</strong>, covering scientific publications, citations, patents, and international collaboration.</p> <p>Data were obtained from <strong>OpenAlex</strong> and <strong>Espacenet</strong>, normalized to ensure comparability across institutions, and aggregated into a composite maturity score (Q) ranging from 0 to 1. Each institution is classified into one of five maturity levels, from Initial to Optimized.</p> <p>The dataset supports comparative and reproducible analyses of research and innovation capacity in engineering universities and can be reused for longitudinal, regional, or sector-specific studies.</p> |
| title | From Capability Index to Maturity Model: Institutional Strategies for Innovation in Engineering Education |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18319831 |