Evaluating Post-Institutional IP Frameworks: The Case of FUCT and Cultural Collateralization
Fuente:
Zenodo
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Publié: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866901615991062528 |
|---|---|
| author | Robert-Brunetti, Emmelie |
| author_facet | Robert-Brunetti, Emmelie |
| contents | <p>This working paper presents a post-institutional framework for the valuation and governance of intellectual property assets whose significance derives from cultural sovereignty, legal precedent, and sustained subcultural relevance.</p> <p>Using FUCT as a case study, the paper examines narrative sovereignty, constructive scarcity, and decentralized valuation architectures as mechanisms for preserving authorship integrity and enabling collateralization without institutional dependency.</p> <p>The framework builds upon established intrinsic value governance principles and is intended for citation, scholarly reference, and long-horizon cultural asset governance. It does not constitute legal advice, investment solicitation, or a commercial offering.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18328715 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Evaluating Post-Institutional IP Frameworks: The Case of FUCT and Cultural Collateralization Robert-Brunetti, Emmelie post-institutional valuation intellectual property governance cultural collateral authorship integrity decentralized valuation FUCT cultural record governance <p>This working paper presents a post-institutional framework for the valuation and governance of intellectual property assets whose significance derives from cultural sovereignty, legal precedent, and sustained subcultural relevance.</p> <p>Using FUCT as a case study, the paper examines narrative sovereignty, constructive scarcity, and decentralized valuation architectures as mechanisms for preserving authorship integrity and enabling collateralization without institutional dependency.</p> <p>The framework builds upon established intrinsic value governance principles and is intended for citation, scholarly reference, and long-horizon cultural asset governance. It does not constitute legal advice, investment solicitation, or a commercial offering.</p> |
| title | Evaluating Post-Institutional IP Frameworks: The Case of FUCT and Cultural Collateralization |
| topic | post-institutional valuation intellectual property governance cultural collateral authorship integrity decentralized valuation FUCT cultural record governance |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18328715 |