Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Langue: | |
| Publié: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Accès en ligne: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18349406 |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Table des matières:
- <p> </p> <h2><strong>Description</strong></h2> <p>This paper explores the relationship between religious texts and modern science through the lens of <strong>conceptual parallelism</strong>, rather than scientific prediction or empirical validation. It argues that many perceived conflicts between science and religion arise from category confusion—specifically, the misuse of scientific methods to evaluate metaphysical claims, and the reinterpretation of religious texts as technical manuals.</p> <p>By examining selected conceptual themes such as boundaries (Barzakh), light as knowledge, balance, and the quantum uncertainty principle, the study demonstrates that religious discourse operates at a conceptual and epistemic level, while science functions at a mechanistic and experimental level. These domains are shown to be complementary rather than competitive.</p> <p>The paper rejects both scientism and pseudo-scientific theological claims, proposing instead an epistemically grounded framework that preserves the integrity and limits of both scientific inquiry and religious understanding. The work contributes to philosophy of science, science–religion dialogue, and epistemology by clarifying how meaning, knowledge limits, and representation are structured across domains.</p> <p>Keywords:</p> <p>Philosophy of Science, Epistemic Limits, Conceptual Parallelism, Science and Religion, Quantum Uncertainty, Knowledge Boundaries</p>