Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Langue: | |
| Publié: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Accès en ligne: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18398211 |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Table des matières:
- <h2> </h2> <p><strong>Title (Collection):</strong><br><strong>Sovereign Legitimacy & Decision Infrastructure (SLDI)</strong><br><em>A Constitution-Anchored, AI-Native, International-Grade State Control Framework</em></p> <p><strong>Author:</strong><br><strong>Dr. B. Mazumdar, D.Sc. (Hon.), D.Litt. (Hon.)</strong><br>Independent Researcher–Scholar — AI Governance • Cybersecurity • Post-Quantum Cryptography • Digital Statecraft<br>Founder, <strong>FAIR+D Canon</strong> — India (2025)<br>ORCID: <a href="https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5615-3558">https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5615-3558</a></p> <h3><strong>Description</strong></h3> <p>This Zenodo record publishes the <strong>final, authoritative five-document canon</strong> of the <strong>Sovereign Legitimacy & Decision Infrastructure (SLDI)</strong>—a next-generation state architecture that binds constitutional authority, artificial intelligence execution, and national data operations into a single, machine-verifiable legitimacy and control plane.</p> <p>SLDI defines governance as an executable, auditable system in which <strong>legality, authority, and technical permission are inseparable prerequisites</strong> of state action. Moving beyond GovTech and digital administration, this framework establishes <strong>structural operational dependency</strong>, ensuring that governmental decisions—human or AI-assisted—are valid only when constitutionally authorized, procedurally legitimate, technically permitted, and cryptographically provable.</p> <p>The collection is written to <strong>international best standards</strong>, fully in English, and structured for <strong>courts, governments, global institutions, engineers, and policy leaders</strong>. It is vendor-agnostic, constitution-first, and designed for long-term sovereign continuity in the AI era.</p> <h3><strong>Published Documents (Final Set — 5 PDFs)</strong></h3> <h4><strong>PDF-1 — Canonical Core Doctrine (MASTER)</strong></h4> <p><strong>Sovereign Legitimacy & Decision Infrastructure (SLDI)</strong><br><em>Primary, citable, doctrine-level reference</em></p> <p>The definitive source of truth defining SLDI’s philosophy, principles, and core architecture. Establishes the foundational legitimacy rule set, the four-condition validity doctrine, and the integrated control plane binding law, authority, data, and AI. This document anchors all citations, judicial references, and international recognition.</p> <h4><strong>PDF-2 — Technical & System Architecture Reference</strong></h4> <p><em>Engineering-grade sovereign systems specification</em></p> <p>Provides a rigorous technical exposition of SLDI internals, including the State Decision Operating System (SD-OS), AI Execution Permission Layer (AEPL), National Data & Decision Routing Fabric (NDDRF), and real-time control observability. Clearly separates control plane and execution plane logic, enabling vendor-agnostic implementation while preserving sovereign dependency.</p> <h4><strong>PDF-3 — Legal–Constitutional Mapping & Model Act</strong></h4> <p><em>Judicially and legislatively operable framework</em></p> <p>Delivers a model Sovereign AI & Legitimacy Act with precise constitutional alignment logic. Covers delegation of authority, emergency powers, reversibility thresholds, judicial review pathways, and statutory lock-in mechanisms. This document creates enforceable legal dependency and durability across political cycles.</p> <h4><strong>PDF-4 — International Interoperability & Standardization Paper</strong></h4> <p><em>Global governance and treaty-grade reference</em></p> <p>Positions SLDI as a global standard candidate for lawful state interaction in the AI era. Defines cross-border legitimacy proofs, treaty alignment models, international audit usability, arbitration readiness, and controlled defence interoperability—without compromising sovereignty or constitutional supremacy.</p> <h4><strong>PDF-5 — Licensing, Compliance & Economic Model</strong></h4> <p><em>Sovereign monetization and enforcement architecture</em></p> <p>Establishes the national sovereign license structure, sectoral module licensing, vendor compliance and certification regime, procurement integration, and recurring economic model. This document converts SLDI into a <strong>permanent, enforceable, and revenue-sustaining sovereign control infrastructure</strong>.</p> <h3><strong>Scope & Impact</strong></h3> <ul> <li>Constitution-first AI governance</li> <li>Machine-verifiable legality and authority</li> <li>Internationally defensible state decision-making</li> <li>Vendor-neutral yet sovereign-dependent architecture</li> <li>Long-horizon licensing and compliance power</li> </ul> <h3><strong>Intended Audience</strong></h3> <p>Heads of State • Law & Justice Ministries • Finance & Planning Authorities • Gov-CTOs • National Cloud & Data Authorities • Courts • International Organizations • Defence & Security Institutions • Policy and Standards Bodies</p> <h3><strong>Canonical Status</strong></h3> <p>This five-PDF set constitutes the <strong>final, complete, and authoritative SLDI canon</strong>. Together, these documents define not a product or platform, but a <strong>permanent layer of statehood for the age of artificial intelligence</strong>.</p>