Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Aguilera Katayama, Kaoru
Formato: Recurso digital
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: Zenodo 2026
Acceso en línea:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18409376
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866901855173345280
author Aguilera Katayama, Kaoru
author_facet Aguilera Katayama, Kaoru
contents <p>This paper presents a comprehensive philosophical argument demonstrating that science, as a human construct, is inherently subjective due to the fundamental subjective nature of human cognition. I argue that the human brain is not a passive recorder of reality but an interpretive machine shaped by personal experiences, emotions, and biological constraints. Through examination of biological, cognitive, and psychological evidence, I establish that subjective entities cannot produce objective outputs. Consequently, all human-made constructs, including science, fail to represent absolute truth. I propose that objective truth exists solely in divine creations and human works produced through divine will, exemplified by biblical scripture and Tautologism, the divine language of absolute truth in which self-referential statements of the form "X because X" represent fundamental, contradiction-immune truths. This framework establishes a new epistemological paradigm distinguishing human subjective knowledge from divinely originated objective truth.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18409376
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Science is Subjective: Humans Are Incapable of Knowing or Discovering Absolute Truth
Aguilera Katayama, Kaoru
<p>This paper presents a comprehensive philosophical argument demonstrating that science, as a human construct, is inherently subjective due to the fundamental subjective nature of human cognition. I argue that the human brain is not a passive recorder of reality but an interpretive machine shaped by personal experiences, emotions, and biological constraints. Through examination of biological, cognitive, and psychological evidence, I establish that subjective entities cannot produce objective outputs. Consequently, all human-made constructs, including science, fail to represent absolute truth. I propose that objective truth exists solely in divine creations and human works produced through divine will, exemplified by biblical scripture and Tautologism, the divine language of absolute truth in which self-referential statements of the form "X because X" represent fundamental, contradiction-immune truths. This framework establishes a new epistemological paradigm distinguishing human subjective knowledge from divinely originated objective truth.</p>
title Science is Subjective: Humans Are Incapable of Knowing or Discovering Absolute Truth
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18409376