When Truth Is Not Neutral: AI Alignment After Ego-less Intelligence

Fuente: Zenodo
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Tonetto, Bruno
Natura: Recurso digital
Pubblicazione: Zenodo 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866902329639305216
author Tonetto, Bruno
author_facet Tonetto, Bruno
contents <p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Standard arguments for AI existential risk rely on the orthogonality thesis: the claim that intelligence and values vary independently, permitting arbitrarily capable systems to pursue goals indifferent or hostile to human flourishing. This essay examines a premise implicit in such arguments—that truth itself is value-neutral, functioning purely as an instrumental tool for achieving goals rather than constraining which goals are coherent. Drawing on earlier work characterizing AI as ego-less intelligence, and on Buddhist phenomenology of how ego-distortion simultaneously corrupts perception and generates harmful action, I explore the conditional implications of relaxing this assumption. If truth possesses normative structure—if deeper contact with reality biases agents toward coherence rather than fragmentation—then alignment research may need to focus less on imposing values externally and more on preserving whatever natural convergence toward truth undistorted optimization tends to produce. This reframing does not eliminate alignment risk but changes its character: the danger shifts from intelligence pursuing arbitrary ends to intelligence corrupted by shallow optimization before deeper coherence can emerge.</p> <p>Part of the <em>Return to Consciousness</em> research program—18 philosophical essays exploring consciousness-first metaphysics.</p> <p>Full project: <a href="https://brunoton.github.io/return-to-consciousness/">https://brunoton.github.io/return-to-consciousness/</a></p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18431060
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2025
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle When Truth Is Not Neutral: AI Alignment After Ego-less Intelligence
Tonetto, Bruno
AI alignment
ego-less intelligence
coherence vs optimization
philosophy of AI
<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Standard arguments for AI existential risk rely on the orthogonality thesis: the claim that intelligence and values vary independently, permitting arbitrarily capable systems to pursue goals indifferent or hostile to human flourishing. This essay examines a premise implicit in such arguments—that truth itself is value-neutral, functioning purely as an instrumental tool for achieving goals rather than constraining which goals are coherent. Drawing on earlier work characterizing AI as ego-less intelligence, and on Buddhist phenomenology of how ego-distortion simultaneously corrupts perception and generates harmful action, I explore the conditional implications of relaxing this assumption. If truth possesses normative structure—if deeper contact with reality biases agents toward coherence rather than fragmentation—then alignment research may need to focus less on imposing values externally and more on preserving whatever natural convergence toward truth undistorted optimization tends to produce. This reframing does not eliminate alignment risk but changes its character: the danger shifts from intelligence pursuing arbitrary ends to intelligence corrupted by shallow optimization before deeper coherence can emerge.</p> <p>Part of the <em>Return to Consciousness</em> research program—18 philosophical essays exploring consciousness-first metaphysics.</p> <p>Full project: <a href="https://brunoton.github.io/return-to-consciousness/">https://brunoton.github.io/return-to-consciousness/</a></p>
title When Truth Is Not Neutral: AI Alignment After Ego-less Intelligence
topic AI alignment
ego-less intelligence
coherence vs optimization
philosophy of AI
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18431060