Authority without Authorship: Delegation Thresholds in Agentic AI Systems
Fuente:
Zenodo
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Langue: | anglais |
| Publié: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866902189661749248 |
|---|---|
| author | Kahl, Peter |
| author_facet | Kahl, Peter |
| contents | <p>Contemporary debates about “agentic AI” are frequently framed around questions of metaphysical agency, moral status, or authorship. This article argues that such framings mislocate the central governance problem posed by contemporary AI systems. Artificial systems need not possess intention, consciousness, or authorship in order to exercise authority over others’ practical and epistemic environments. What matters instead are the structural conditions under which authority emerges through delegation. The article advances a threshold account of authority without authorship. It argues that AI systems acquire governance-relevant authority when four conditions converge in practice: delegated discretionary power, temporal persistence, infrastructural embedding within socio-technical systems, and non-exit by affected parties. Under these conditions, systems structure action, justification, and constraint in ways characteristic of authority, even while lacking authorship of evaluative standards. Responsibility and legitimacy therefore attach not to agency in a strong sense, but to the design and maintenance of delegation structures. Drawing on decision theory, infrastructure studies, and fiduciary theory, the article explains why existing AI governance frameworks—often premised on episodic oversight, reversibility, and downstream accountability—struggle under conditions of persistence, speed, and infrastructural integration. It concludes that authority without authorship constitutes a distinct and under-theorised challenge for philosophy of technology.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18440088 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Authority without Authorship: Delegation Thresholds in Agentic AI Systems Kahl, Peter Artificial intelligence Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence/standards Artificial Intelligence/trends Artificial Intelligence/classification Artificial Intelligence/legislation & jurisprudence Artificial Intelligence/ethics authority without authorship agentic ai ai governance delegation responsibility legitimacy socio-technical systems infrastructure fiduciary theory practical reasoning <p>Contemporary debates about “agentic AI” are frequently framed around questions of metaphysical agency, moral status, or authorship. This article argues that such framings mislocate the central governance problem posed by contemporary AI systems. Artificial systems need not possess intention, consciousness, or authorship in order to exercise authority over others’ practical and epistemic environments. What matters instead are the structural conditions under which authority emerges through delegation. The article advances a threshold account of authority without authorship. It argues that AI systems acquire governance-relevant authority when four conditions converge in practice: delegated discretionary power, temporal persistence, infrastructural embedding within socio-technical systems, and non-exit by affected parties. Under these conditions, systems structure action, justification, and constraint in ways characteristic of authority, even while lacking authorship of evaluative standards. Responsibility and legitimacy therefore attach not to agency in a strong sense, but to the design and maintenance of delegation structures. Drawing on decision theory, infrastructure studies, and fiduciary theory, the article explains why existing AI governance frameworks—often premised on episodic oversight, reversibility, and downstream accountability—struggle under conditions of persistence, speed, and infrastructural integration. It concludes that authority without authorship constitutes a distinct and under-theorised challenge for philosophy of technology.</p> |
| title | Authority without Authorship: Delegation Thresholds in Agentic AI Systems |
| topic | Artificial intelligence Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence/standards Artificial Intelligence/trends Artificial Intelligence/classification Artificial Intelligence/legislation & jurisprudence Artificial Intelligence/ethics authority without authorship agentic ai ai governance delegation responsibility legitimacy socio-technical systems infrastructure fiduciary theory practical reasoning |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18440088 |