Normality After Knowledge: A TNK Account of Contemporary Pathologies

Fuente: Zenodo
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Souza, Euclides
Format: Recurso digital
Language:English
Published: Zenodo 2026
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866901430181298176
author Souza, Euclides
author_facet Souza, Euclides
contents <p><span lang="EN-US">This paper proposes a formal and non-normative account of <em>normality</em> grounded in the Theory of Non-Knowledge (TNK). Against statistical, psychological, moral, and epistemic conceptions, we argue that normality is not a property of agents, beliefs, or systems, but a <span>nullificatory stabilization of contradiction</span> within language and practice. By treating contemporary domains—semantic paradoxes, spiritual discourse, mental disorders, non-orthodox physics, libidinal action, and social coordination—as manifestations of structurally unavoidable inconsistency, we show that appeals to “normality” function as <span>meta-negations</span> that close action without resolving meaning. Normality, thus reconceived, is neither truth nor health, but a contingent operational threshold produced by nullification.</span></p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18449499
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Normality After Knowledge: A TNK Account of Contemporary Pathologies
Souza, Euclides
<p><span lang="EN-US">This paper proposes a formal and non-normative account of <em>normality</em> grounded in the Theory of Non-Knowledge (TNK). Against statistical, psychological, moral, and epistemic conceptions, we argue that normality is not a property of agents, beliefs, or systems, but a <span>nullificatory stabilization of contradiction</span> within language and practice. By treating contemporary domains—semantic paradoxes, spiritual discourse, mental disorders, non-orthodox physics, libidinal action, and social coordination—as manifestations of structurally unavoidable inconsistency, we show that appeals to “normality” function as <span>meta-negations</span> that close action without resolving meaning. Normality, thus reconceived, is neither truth nor health, but a contingent operational threshold produced by nullification.</span></p>
title Normality After Knowledge: A TNK Account of Contemporary Pathologies
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18449499