A Note on Persistence and the Occurrence of Thought
Fuente:
Zenodo
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Lingua: | inglese |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866901138868011008 |
|---|---|
| author | Shipkowski, James |
| author_facet | Shipkowski, James |
| contents | <p>This note presents a structural clarification of the dependency between existence and cognition. It distinguishes epistemic evidence of being from the conditions required for any process to occur. While classical formulations such as <em>cogito, ergo sum</em> correctly establish thought as evidence of existence from a first-person standpoint, they risk obscuring a deeper ordering: thought is neither necessary for, nor constitutive of, existence.</p> <p>Existence is treated minimally as persistence under transformation. Within this framework, cognition is understood as a contingent, emergent process that may arise when continued persistence requires adaptive change. The formulation “I am, therefore thought occurs” is introduced strictly as a clarification of structural dependency, not as a metaphysical claim or proof.</p> <p>The note is non-teleological, non-epistemic, and non-metaphysical in scope, and is intended to constrain common category errors concerning being, thought, observers, and foundations.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18460970 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | A Note on Persistence and the Occurrence of Thought Shipkowski, James ontology persistence constraint cognition structural philosophy non-teleological framework foundations of science philosophy of mind emergence admissibility recursion identity <p>This note presents a structural clarification of the dependency between existence and cognition. It distinguishes epistemic evidence of being from the conditions required for any process to occur. While classical formulations such as <em>cogito, ergo sum</em> correctly establish thought as evidence of existence from a first-person standpoint, they risk obscuring a deeper ordering: thought is neither necessary for, nor constitutive of, existence.</p> <p>Existence is treated minimally as persistence under transformation. Within this framework, cognition is understood as a contingent, emergent process that may arise when continued persistence requires adaptive change. The formulation “I am, therefore thought occurs” is introduced strictly as a clarification of structural dependency, not as a metaphysical claim or proof.</p> <p>The note is non-teleological, non-epistemic, and non-metaphysical in scope, and is intended to constrain common category errors concerning being, thought, observers, and foundations.</p> |
| title | A Note on Persistence and the Occurrence of Thought |
| topic | ontology persistence constraint cognition structural philosophy non-teleological framework foundations of science philosophy of mind emergence admissibility recursion identity |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18460970 |