Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Langue: | |
| Publié: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Accès en ligne: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18498822 |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Table des matières:
- <p dir="ltr">Abstract: </p> <p dir="ltr">Gödel established a system of mapping—Gödel numbering—to encode semantic "words" into the domain of arithmetic. Through this arithmetization, low-dimensional numerical sequences are forced to "carry" high-dimensional logical significance. This is analogous to projecting a multi-dimensional holographic human onto a two-dimensional photograph. To then point at the image and declare, "Behold, this person cannot breathe," is to commit a categorical error of dimensional confusion. Respiration is an organic function of a three-dimensional being, whereas a photograph is merely an arrangement of pixels.</p> <p>This paper argues that Gödel’s paradox exists only within this confusion. In the intra-dimensional game, the formula $G$ is an inert sign; it does not "say" anything. In the cross-dimensional view, the "truth" we claim for $G$ is a semantic tautology—a piece of prose we have added to a calculation. We have not found a limit to reason, but a limit to the medium of mapping. Where the rules of the game end, we mistake the silence of the signs for a "higher truth."</p>