Geometric Interpretation of Nuclear Fission, Fusion, and the Neutron Anomaly.
Fuente:
Zenodo
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Recurso digital |
| Publicado: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866902010640465920 |
|---|---|
| author | Jusang, Lee |
| author_facet | Jusang, Lee |
| contents | <p>Standard nuclear physics quantifies energetic phenomena through mass defect (∆m) and the<br>equivalence principle E = mc2, yet the ontological origin of mass itself remains elusive. Lattice<br>Continuous Monism (LCM) proposes a topological substrate for these phenomena by defining mass<br>as the static elastic strain of a hyper-rigid vacuum lattice. In this paper, we address the ”scale<br>gap” criticism by quantitatively demonstrating that the lattice’s geometric coupling constant (αs ≈<br>0.11785) naturally scales the binding energy to the MeV range. Furthermore, we present three key<br>geometric derivations: (1) The Proton Mass is derived from the topological winding number of the<br>Truncated Octahedron (6π5), achieving 99.99% accuracy; (2) The Neutron-Proton mass difference<br>is resolved as torsional strain along the lattice’s weak interaction axes (8/π); (3) Nuclear Fission<br>energy is identified not as mass destruction, but as the elastic snap-back of lattice tension (∼ 166<br>MeV). We interpret fusion as ”Topological Optimization” (Kelvin problem), suggesting that nuclear<br>energy is physically the release of vacuum lattice tension.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18513736 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Geometric Interpretation of Nuclear Fission, Fusion, and the Neutron Anomaly. Jusang, Lee Lattice Strain Dynamics; Proton Mass Origin; Geometric Resonance; Nuclear Binding Energy; Hard Core Repulsion; Iron Peak Limit; Lattice-Continuous Monism (LCM); <p>Standard nuclear physics quantifies energetic phenomena through mass defect (∆m) and the<br>equivalence principle E = mc2, yet the ontological origin of mass itself remains elusive. Lattice<br>Continuous Monism (LCM) proposes a topological substrate for these phenomena by defining mass<br>as the static elastic strain of a hyper-rigid vacuum lattice. In this paper, we address the ”scale<br>gap” criticism by quantitatively demonstrating that the lattice’s geometric coupling constant (αs ≈<br>0.11785) naturally scales the binding energy to the MeV range. Furthermore, we present three key<br>geometric derivations: (1) The Proton Mass is derived from the topological winding number of the<br>Truncated Octahedron (6π5), achieving 99.99% accuracy; (2) The Neutron-Proton mass difference<br>is resolved as torsional strain along the lattice’s weak interaction axes (8/π); (3) Nuclear Fission<br>energy is identified not as mass destruction, but as the elastic snap-back of lattice tension (∼ 166<br>MeV). We interpret fusion as ”Topological Optimization” (Kelvin problem), suggesting that nuclear<br>energy is physically the release of vacuum lattice tension.</p> |
| title | Geometric Interpretation of Nuclear Fission, Fusion, and the Neutron Anomaly. |
| topic | Lattice Strain Dynamics; Proton Mass Origin; Geometric Resonance; Nuclear Binding Energy; Hard Core Repulsion; Iron Peak Limit; Lattice-Continuous Monism (LCM); |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18513736 |