CE_5 Admissible Redescription Under Envelope NonContact
Fuente:
Zenodo
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866901361917952000 |
|---|---|
| author | Maley, Amos |
| author_facet | Maley, Amos |
| contents | <p>This paper demonstrates that admissible re-description is possible only under strict non-contact between constraint envelopes. Once an envelope is fixed, re-descriptions may occur internally, but any attempt to transfer structure, justification, or constraints across envelopes is shown to violate admissibility.</p> <p>The analysis is eliminative and necessity-based. It shows that apparent cross-envelope reasoning—such as global coordination, shared parameters, or meta-level reconciliation—depends on illicit scope transport that is not licensed by any envelope. When envelope non-contact is enforced, only internal re-descriptions remain admissible, and these preserve standing without introducing new structure.</p> <p>The result explains why cross-domain unification fails when treated as contact between envelopes, while internal coherence remains intact. No procedures, mappings, or translation rules are provided. The paper records a hard boundary on admissible re-description that preserves the integrity of constraint envelopes and prevents hidden admissibility violations.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18518022 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | CE_5 Admissible Redescription Under Envelope NonContact Maley, Amos <p>This paper demonstrates that admissible re-description is possible only under strict non-contact between constraint envelopes. Once an envelope is fixed, re-descriptions may occur internally, but any attempt to transfer structure, justification, or constraints across envelopes is shown to violate admissibility.</p> <p>The analysis is eliminative and necessity-based. It shows that apparent cross-envelope reasoning—such as global coordination, shared parameters, or meta-level reconciliation—depends on illicit scope transport that is not licensed by any envelope. When envelope non-contact is enforced, only internal re-descriptions remain admissible, and these preserve standing without introducing new structure.</p> <p>The result explains why cross-domain unification fails when treated as contact between envelopes, while internal coherence remains intact. No procedures, mappings, or translation rules are provided. The paper records a hard boundary on admissible re-description that preserves the integrity of constraint envelopes and prevents hidden admissibility violations.</p> |
| title | CE_5 Admissible Redescription Under Envelope NonContact |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18518022 |