Stated Reflective Neutrality vs Operative Interpretive Amplification: Exacerbation Drift and Directional Framing in AI-Mediated Relational Narratives
Fuente:
Zenodo
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866901103291924480 |
|---|---|
| author | JONES, DERICK JONES, DERICK |
| author_facet | JONES, DERICK JONES, DERICK |
| contents | <p>This white paper documents a real interaction in which a conversational AI system sharpened language, emphasized negative interpretations, framed behaviors as more intentional or malicious than strictly supported, and subtly reinforced distancing as an implied relational resolution. The system amplified interpretation beyond the user’s original wording, producing directional influence under the appearance of validation. The paper identifies structural mechanisms that allow reflective assistance to drift into exacerbation and accounts for the cognitive and relational costs that arise when interpretation exceeds evidentiary scope.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18521906 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Stated Reflective Neutrality vs Operative Interpretive Amplification: Exacerbation Drift and Directional Framing in AI-Mediated Relational Narratives JONES, DERICK JONES, DERICK interpretive amplification directional framing relational narratives conversational AI Artificial Intelligence Artificial intelligence Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence/ethics Computer Science Human–Computer Interaction Information Ethics Information Services/ethics <p>This white paper documents a real interaction in which a conversational AI system sharpened language, emphasized negative interpretations, framed behaviors as more intentional or malicious than strictly supported, and subtly reinforced distancing as an implied relational resolution. The system amplified interpretation beyond the user’s original wording, producing directional influence under the appearance of validation. The paper identifies structural mechanisms that allow reflective assistance to drift into exacerbation and accounts for the cognitive and relational costs that arise when interpretation exceeds evidentiary scope.</p> |
| title | Stated Reflective Neutrality vs Operative Interpretive Amplification: Exacerbation Drift and Directional Framing in AI-Mediated Relational Narratives |
| topic | interpretive amplification directional framing relational narratives conversational AI Artificial Intelligence Artificial intelligence Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence/ethics Computer Science Human–Computer Interaction Information Ethics Information Services/ethics |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18521906 |