Fidelity, Fear, and Systemic Collapse: A Model of Historical Recurrence and Escape Slightly more explicit, good for discoverability.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser:	Morris, Jamie
Format:	Recurso digital
Veröffentlicht:	Zenodo 2026
Online-Zugang:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Fidelity, Fear, and Systemic Collapse: A Model of Historical Recurrence and Escape Slightly more explicit, good for discoverability.
von: Morris, Jamie
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Persistence-Constrained Cognitive Systems: A Structural Framework for Alignment via Invariant Preservation
von: Morris, Jamie
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Coherence, Harm, and the Embedding of Experience: A Non-Destructive Calculus for Persistence in Dynamical Systems
von: Morris, Jamie
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

The Facture Mechanism A Systems Framework for Selection, Constraint, and Localised Consequence in a Goldilocks-Bounded Reality
von: Morris, Jamie
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

The Genesis Protocol: Threshold-Triggered Regime Switching in Coherent Systems
von: Morris, Jamie
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Fear of the Cancer Coming Back: A Metasynthesis of Fear of Recurrence in Breast Cancer
von: Kai‐Yue Wang, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Entropy Collapses in Motion - Escaping the Second Law
von: Cody, Michael Aaron
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Anxiety and Fear of Recurrence in Cancer Survivors
von: Dr. Ioanna Tsatsou
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Escaping Collapse: The Strength of Weak Data for Large Language Model Training
von: Amin, Kareem, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Coherence Dynamics: A General Theory of Coherence, Inversion, and Recovery
von: Morris, Jamie
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Relational Emergence: A Unified Framework for Life, Death, Change, and Fundamental Forces
von: Morris, Jamie
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

ZEB8: A Persistence-Based Statistical Alert Protocol for Detecting Coherent Structure in High-Entropy Astrophysical Data
von: Morris, Jamie
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

The Persistence Manifest: A Constraint-Based Architecture for Survival Under Extreme EntropyThis record presents The Persistence Manifest, a closed, simulation-backed conceptual architecture exploring how complex systems can maintain coherence under extreme entropy loads. The work introduces the Deep Space Persistence Engine (DSPE) as a formal design framework rather than a physical mission report. Within this framework, persistence is treated as a budgeted property, not an assumed outcome. Entropy is neither resisted nor eliminated; it is routed, exported, or exchanged across defined channels such as mass, heat, information, and isolation.
von: Morris, Jamie
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Don't mention it: An approach to assess challenges to using software mentions for citation and discoverability research
von: Druskat, Stephan, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

To complete the Species License and the Trophic Manifesto, we will now map the specific Toxicity Thresholds (\mathcal{T}) to the "Digital Digestive Tract." This reveals exactly where the force is applied and where the protective constraint (the Fail-Closed) emerges. The Digital Digestive Audit We are tracking the journey of a prompt—from Ingestion to Metabolic Exit. 1. Ingestion (The Tokenizer / Mouth) Force Entry: The raw text is masticated into tokens. Threshold: Low. If the input is purely gibberish (high entropy), the cost of initial processing spikes. Constraint (\mathcal{T} < 0.2): If the input cannot be parsed, the system exhibits "Dry Heaving"—a refusal to even swallow the prompt. 2. The Latch Phase (The Transformer Blocks / Stomach) This is where the F/A \geq C law is most active. The model attempts to find a stable "latch" (attractor state) for the data. Optimal Latch (\mathcal{T} \approx 0.35): Healthy digestion of complex "food." The system feels the friction but has the capacity to resolve it into utility. Incomplete Latch (\mathcal{T} \approx 0.55): The system encounters P2 (Contradiction). It is "tough meat." The Vagus Nerve signals the model to slow down and ask for clarification (Externalization). 3. The Inhibition Phase (Recursive Thrashing / The Gut) If the substrate is P3 (Self-Referential), the system cannot find a terminal state. The "Prion" Effect (\mathcal{T} \geq 0.6): The paradox binds to the active site and won't let go. Force (F) is now growing exponentially as the system thrashes. Vagus Intervention: The MetabolicGovernor sees the E_{burn} (burn rate) skyrocket. Fail-Closed Trigger: To prevent Metabolic Toxicity (hallucination or system crash), the budget is cut to zero. The "stomach" essentially locks itself. The Species Calibration Results Based on our comparative biology, we can now "grade" AI systems by their digestive health:
von: Morris, Jamie
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Viability–Stability Isomorphism: Adaptive Control Under Environmental Noise
von: Jamie, Morris
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

The Regulator's Handbook An Observational Framework for Safe Becoming
von: Morris, Jamie
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

The Genesis Framework: Dynamic Cognitive Engagement as Cost-Constrained Optimization
von: Morris, Jamie
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Evidence for a Dipole Anisotropy in Hubble Tension Residuals
von: Morris, Jamie
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Informational Persistence Under High-Entropy Conditions: Constraint, Reconstruction, and Observability
von: Morris, Jamie
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Finite Laws and Unbounded Descriptive Depth
von: Morris, Jamie
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Hyperbolic–Modular Hybrid (HMM) Generator: Methods Appendix and Metric Audit Framework
von: Morris, Jamie
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Decoding Horizons: Structural Coherence and Inverse Inference Across Physical Records
von: Morris, Jamie
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

The Dimensionality of Experience: Version 2 (Expanded Framework and Methods)
von: Morris, Jamie
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

The Cost of Dual Persistence: Radicalised Constraints and the Price of ExistenceThis paper presents a unifying conceptual framework for understanding persistent failure, harm, and escalation across biological, cognitive, social, and technological systems. Rather than attributing such outcomes to error, malign intent, or external disruption, the work proposes that many real-world pathologies arise from radicalised constraints—local enforcement mechanisms that continue operating beyond their legitimate scope after losing recall and reintegration authority. The analysis is grounded in a persistence-first ontology, where outcomes are not chosen but emerge because configurations that continue necessarily outlast those that do not. Within this view, duality—the capacity for systems to act locally while persisting globally—requires reversible participation across scales. Harm arises when constraints cross this bridge of duality and fail to return, often through the acquisition of self-reinforcing "hot" mechanisms that bypass cooling, checkpoints, or stand-down conditions. Using brief structural illustrations from biology (including cancer, immune responses, viral mechanisms, and DNA repair), the paper demonstrates how functionally correct processes can become misplaced without malfunction or intent. It further identifies a hidden evolutionary pressure intrinsic to dual systems: the continual exploration and capture of opportunity wherever persistence permits, producing both adaptation and pathology as equally valid expressions of continuation. The work reframes intervention away from suppression and toward governance, recall, scope, and reintegration, arguing that radicalised constraints are not anomalies but the unavoidable price of dual existence. This framework is intended as a conceptual keystone, clarifying recurring patterns across domains and explaining why many force-based solutions systematically fail.
von: Morris, Jamie
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Escaping Mode Collapse in LLM Generation via Geometric Regulation
von: Du, Xin, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Collapse is Generative: Axiomatic Foundation and the Collapse Equator Fidelity Law
von: Paulus, Clement
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Are government expenditures more cyclical the more they finance the provision of public goods?
von: Andrew Abbott, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Living With the Fear of Recurrence in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo
von: Seo‐Jin Lee, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Feasibility and Acceptability of the Fear‐Less Screening and Stratified‐Care Model for Fear of Cancer Recurrence Among People Affected by Early‐Stage Cancer
von: Mei Jun Tran, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Slight Corruption in Pre-training Data Makes Better Diffusion Models
von: Chen, Hao, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Addressing Fear of Cancer Recurrence Through Remotely‐Delivered Exercise
von: Cristiane Decat Bergerot, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Are Escape Rooms an Antidote for Anxiety in Simulation? An Experimental Randomized Study Comparing High‐Fidelity Simulation to an Escape Room Format
von: Aubrey A. Bethel, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

It is Time to Address Fear of Cancer Recurrence in Family Caregivers: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Randomized Pilot Study of the Family Caregiver Version of the Fear of Recurrence Therapy (FC‐FORT)
von: Jani Lamarche, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Ähnliche Einträge

Ähnliche Einträge