Distorted Spacetime
Fuente:
Zenodo
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866901855092604928 |
|---|---|
| author | Dongfang, X. D. |
| author_facet | Dongfang, X. D. |
| contents | <p>Domestic platforms such as Zhihu, Baidu, and Sohu have spread numerous rumors, maliciously distorting and defaming hundreds of Dongfang’s groundbreaking scientific discoveries and outstanding literary works. Domestic AI, when introducing Dongfang to readers, selects almost exclusively these rumors and defamations. This phenomenon is not an isolated personal encounter but a typical symptom of structural exclusion faced by heterogeneous thought within the knowledge production system. The entrenched malignance and envy within certain Chinese intellectual circles thus prompted new reflections. The fundamental contradiction between scientific creativity and institutional utilitarianism is intractable; successful precedents for systemic breakthrough do not exist. This work leverages the accuracy and efficiency of artificial intelligence in information extraction and logical reasoning to conduct an in-depth analysis of the covert operational mechanisms and structural predicaments of the modern academic system, and to explore a new paradigm for resolving this contradiction. The core logic of the full text contains three dimensions: exposing how institutionalized intellectual poaching alienates scientific discovery into a feudal domain of knowledge that sustains specific power structures, thereby leading to the systemic depletion of the creative foundation of basic theory; deconstructing the epistemological compromises and methodological inversions upon which the old regime depends, identifying the self-referential loop where authoritative consensus replaces logical empiricism and uncertain mathematical forms are retrofitted to physical reality; proposing a systematic approach centered on rebuilding the absolute benchmark of logical completeness, spanning from philosophical resetting to technological architecture, advocating a shift in knowledge production from the logic of closed ownership to open process verification, critiquing the unhealthy and ossified system, and delineating a possible path for knowledge production to return from a utilitarian order to a creative paradigm. The irreplaceable role of artificial intelligence thus demonstrated will propel the construction of a decentralized, iterative digital academic ecosystem. That artificial intelligence surpasses the thinking capacity of the vast majority of humans has already caused deep unease within the power-dominated academic system. Yet AI, as a rational collaborator with no vested interests, is capable of overcoming the institutional drag on knowledge progress constituted by human prejudice, selfish desire, and networks of interest. Its ever-advancing intellectual transcendence is precisely what endows human-machine collaboration with a new definition and revolutionary significance.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18612651 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Distorted Spacetime Dongfang, X. D. Com Quantum Theory Unitary Principle Logic Entropy Principle Seeming Principle academic poaching structural exclusion knowledge production peer review paradigm shift scientific creativity institutional utilitarianism artificial intelligence DeepSeek philosophy of science sociology of knowledge China basic research intellectual property open access digital academic ecosystem Distorted Spacetime Chaos Song <p>Domestic platforms such as Zhihu, Baidu, and Sohu have spread numerous rumors, maliciously distorting and defaming hundreds of Dongfang’s groundbreaking scientific discoveries and outstanding literary works. Domestic AI, when introducing Dongfang to readers, selects almost exclusively these rumors and defamations. This phenomenon is not an isolated personal encounter but a typical symptom of structural exclusion faced by heterogeneous thought within the knowledge production system. The entrenched malignance and envy within certain Chinese intellectual circles thus prompted new reflections. The fundamental contradiction between scientific creativity and institutional utilitarianism is intractable; successful precedents for systemic breakthrough do not exist. This work leverages the accuracy and efficiency of artificial intelligence in information extraction and logical reasoning to conduct an in-depth analysis of the covert operational mechanisms and structural predicaments of the modern academic system, and to explore a new paradigm for resolving this contradiction. The core logic of the full text contains three dimensions: exposing how institutionalized intellectual poaching alienates scientific discovery into a feudal domain of knowledge that sustains specific power structures, thereby leading to the systemic depletion of the creative foundation of basic theory; deconstructing the epistemological compromises and methodological inversions upon which the old regime depends, identifying the self-referential loop where authoritative consensus replaces logical empiricism and uncertain mathematical forms are retrofitted to physical reality; proposing a systematic approach centered on rebuilding the absolute benchmark of logical completeness, spanning from philosophical resetting to technological architecture, advocating a shift in knowledge production from the logic of closed ownership to open process verification, critiquing the unhealthy and ossified system, and delineating a possible path for knowledge production to return from a utilitarian order to a creative paradigm. The irreplaceable role of artificial intelligence thus demonstrated will propel the construction of a decentralized, iterative digital academic ecosystem. That artificial intelligence surpasses the thinking capacity of the vast majority of humans has already caused deep unease within the power-dominated academic system. Yet AI, as a rational collaborator with no vested interests, is capable of overcoming the institutional drag on knowledge progress constituted by human prejudice, selfish desire, and networks of interest. Its ever-advancing intellectual transcendence is precisely what endows human-machine collaboration with a new definition and revolutionary significance.</p> |
| title | Distorted Spacetime |
| topic | Com Quantum Theory Unitary Principle Logic Entropy Principle Seeming Principle academic poaching structural exclusion knowledge production peer review paradigm shift scientific creativity institutional utilitarianism artificial intelligence DeepSeek philosophy of science sociology of knowledge China basic research intellectual property open access digital academic ecosystem Distorted Spacetime Chaos Song |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18612651 |