Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18618286 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- All Trips at some point need to be completed by walking. There are various models, which are used to simulate pedestrian observed flow with the real world. A literature study is performed in which we found that Social force model can be preferably used among other models like Cellular Automata model, Magnetic force model, Centrifugal force model. Social force model is one of the models which predicts a lot of observed phenomenon like lane formation, faster is slower, etc. The main aim of this work is to investigate whether the Social force model can deal with big data or not. The aim was to calibrate and validate the social force model with real-world data. If the Social Force model gets calibrated and validated with real-world data, then one can say that Social force model can be used to capture the variability and real-world pedestrian behavior. The pedestrian data is collected by drones. After the extraction of data, it was seen that it contains a lot of noise as speed was fluctuating too much, and while the observed video does not show such behavior. The noise errors in drone data may have occurred due to inaccuracies in the instrument, measurement error and bad weather. Therefore, data smoothening has been done with the help of filters which reject the value above a specific range of frequency. Data smoothening was essential to clean the data for further analysis. Five parameters are chosen i.e. A, B, Relaxation time, Lambda and Desired speed for the purposes calibration. These parameters were calibrated with the help of genetic algorithm by which minimizes the difference between values of observed distance and simulated distance. Initially, only one pedestrian is simulated while others move according to their observed trajectories. Later, the ten pedestrians were simulated simultaneously. Ideally, all the pedestrian should have been simulated together to minimize the error. However, as the genetic algorithm was taking lots of time to minimize the error, more than ten pedestrians was not considered for simulation simultaneously. Errors are noted in case of one pedestrian, two pedestrians and 5 pedestrian simulation together. Further, speed, flow and density variation were explored in the entire stretch over time. Further, the fundamental relation between these three parameters was also explored.