Does dorsal adhesion improve bed bug trap performance? Laboratory comparison with interceptor and adhesive devices
Fuente:
Zenodo
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Langue: | En |
| Publié: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866901984148193280 |
|---|---|
| author | Mailleux, Anne-Catherine |
| author_facet | Mailleux, Anne-Catherine |
| contents | <p>This publication presents a synthesis of independent controlled laboratory and environmental chamber studies evaluating the performance of a patented dorsal-contact adhesive bed bug monitoring trap without integrated chemical attractant.</p> <p>Comparisons were conducted against pitfall interceptors, flat adhesive monitoring devices, and adhesive monitors incorporating pheromone components. Two species were evaluated under controlled conditions: <em>Cimex lectularius</em> and <em>Cimex hemipterus</em>.</p> <p>Across studies, the dorsal-contact trap demonstrated higher capture and detection rates under standardized laboratory conditions. Complete study reports, including detailed protocols and raw data, are provided as supplementary materials.</p> <p>Field validation under natural infestation conditions remains necessary to confirm operational performance.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18662503 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | enc |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Does dorsal adhesion improve bed bug trap performance? Laboratory comparison with interceptor and adhesive devices Mailleux, Anne-Catherine bed bug monitoring Cimex lectularius Cimex hemipterus adhesive trap pitfall interceptor architectural design laboratory study integrated pest management <p>This publication presents a synthesis of independent controlled laboratory and environmental chamber studies evaluating the performance of a patented dorsal-contact adhesive bed bug monitoring trap without integrated chemical attractant.</p> <p>Comparisons were conducted against pitfall interceptors, flat adhesive monitoring devices, and adhesive monitors incorporating pheromone components. Two species were evaluated under controlled conditions: <em>Cimex lectularius</em> and <em>Cimex hemipterus</em>.</p> <p>Across studies, the dorsal-contact trap demonstrated higher capture and detection rates under standardized laboratory conditions. Complete study reports, including detailed protocols and raw data, are provided as supplementary materials.</p> <p>Field validation under natural infestation conditions remains necessary to confirm operational performance.</p> |
| title | Does dorsal adhesion improve bed bug trap performance? Laboratory comparison with interceptor and adhesive devices |
| topic | bed bug monitoring Cimex lectularius Cimex hemipterus adhesive trap pitfall interceptor architectural design laboratory study integrated pest management |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18662503 |