| _version_ | 1866901582396784640 |
|---|---|
| author | Khumalo, Kgalakwane Masipa, Mamphela Ntshenhleko, Nthabi Motshega, Sipho |
| author_facet | Khumalo, Kgalakwane Masipa, Mamphela Ntshenhleko, Nthabi Motshega, Sipho |
| contents | <p>Climate change litigation in South Africa has increased over recent years, reflecting broader global trends but with unique characteristics shaped by local legal and environmental contexts. A systematic review of judicial decisions, administrative records, and legal literature from to was conducted. Data were analysed using thematic coding and statistical methods to identify patterns and gaps in climate change litigation. Findings indicate a significant increase (p < 0.001) in the number of climate change-related lawsuits filed over the last decade, with enforcement actions showing mixed success rates across various sectors. The analysis reveals that while there has been progress in legal challenges and compliance measures, persistent issues such as funding constraints and public awareness remain significant barriers to comprehensive environmental protection. Recommendations include increased investment in climate change education and advocacy campaigns, alongside the development of clearer legal precedents for effective enforcement strategies. The empirical specification follows $Y=\beta_0+\beta^\top X+\varepsilon$, and inference is reported with uncertainty-aware statistical criteria.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18710484 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2000 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Climate Change Litigation and Enforcement in South Africa: A Meta-Analysis Khumalo, Kgalakwane Masipa, Mamphela Ntshenhleko, Nthabi Motshega, Sipho Sub-Saharan jurisprudence epistemology synthesis governance biodiversity scepticism <p>Climate change litigation in South Africa has increased over recent years, reflecting broader global trends but with unique characteristics shaped by local legal and environmental contexts. A systematic review of judicial decisions, administrative records, and legal literature from to was conducted. Data were analysed using thematic coding and statistical methods to identify patterns and gaps in climate change litigation. Findings indicate a significant increase (p < 0.001) in the number of climate change-related lawsuits filed over the last decade, with enforcement actions showing mixed success rates across various sectors. The analysis reveals that while there has been progress in legal challenges and compliance measures, persistent issues such as funding constraints and public awareness remain significant barriers to comprehensive environmental protection. Recommendations include increased investment in climate change education and advocacy campaigns, alongside the development of clearer legal precedents for effective enforcement strategies. The empirical specification follows $Y=\beta_0+\beta^\top X+\varepsilon$, and inference is reported with uncertainty-aware statistical criteria.</p> |
| title | Climate Change Litigation and Enforcement in South Africa: A Meta-Analysis |
| topic | Sub-Saharan jurisprudence epistemology synthesis governance biodiversity scepticism |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18710484 |