The Substrate Migration Principle: How Computing Advances by Enforcing Invariants Below the Application Layer
Fuente:
Zenodo
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Langue: | anglais |
| Publié: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866901615910322176 |
|---|---|
| author | Ableman Mazurk, Adam |
| author_facet | Ableman Mazurk, Adam |
| contents | <p>This paper introduces the <strong>Substrate Migration Principle (SMP)</strong>, a structural account of how computing systems evolve under reliability and scale pressure. Across decades of systems development, recurring failure classes - memory corruption, concurrency anomalies, undefined behavior, and isolation breaches - have migrated from voluntary discipline at the application layer into mechanically enforced invariants at the substrate layer. SMP formalizes this recurring pattern as invariant descent: when failures exhibit structural regularity, overwhelm local discipline under scale, and admit partial formalization, they are reconstituted as substrate-level constraints.</p> <p>The paper argues that contemporary AI-driven and autonomous systems exhibit a new failure class: <strong>unauthorized semantic continuation</strong>—the unlicensed escalation of semantic artifacts across transformation boundaries. Unlike discrete syntactic errors, these failures propagate through authority drift and escalation without explicit binding to admissibility conditions. A worked example in clinical decision-support pipelines illustrates how semantic artifacts can escalate in authority without structural constraint.</p> <p>To demonstrate feasibility, the paper introduces a minimal <strong>authority lattice</strong> model for constraining semantic escalation via promotion tokens and partial order enforcement. The aim is not to mechanize moral legitimacy, but to formalize enforceable subsets of continuation structure. Governance, in this framework, becomes a candidate invariant class subject to partial formalization under structural pressure.</p> <p>SMP is presented as a diagnostic and predictive systems principle. It does not claim inevitability or full mechanization of governance. Rather, it offers an architectural lens for identifying when voluntary discipline collapses under autonomy and economic consequence, signaling pressure for invariant descent. The work situates itself within systems theory traditions including least privilege, information flow lattices, and temporal invariants, extending those trajectories toward semantic and authority-level constraints in AI systems.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18726868 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | The Substrate Migration Principle: How Computing Advances by Enforcing Invariants Below the Application Layer Ableman Mazurk, Adam Substrate Migration Principle invariant descent systems architecture formal methods authority lattice semantic escalation unauthorized continuation AI governance agentic systems information flow least privilege epistemic systems substrate enforcement partial formalization reliability theory <p>This paper introduces the <strong>Substrate Migration Principle (SMP)</strong>, a structural account of how computing systems evolve under reliability and scale pressure. Across decades of systems development, recurring failure classes - memory corruption, concurrency anomalies, undefined behavior, and isolation breaches - have migrated from voluntary discipline at the application layer into mechanically enforced invariants at the substrate layer. SMP formalizes this recurring pattern as invariant descent: when failures exhibit structural regularity, overwhelm local discipline under scale, and admit partial formalization, they are reconstituted as substrate-level constraints.</p> <p>The paper argues that contemporary AI-driven and autonomous systems exhibit a new failure class: <strong>unauthorized semantic continuation</strong>—the unlicensed escalation of semantic artifacts across transformation boundaries. Unlike discrete syntactic errors, these failures propagate through authority drift and escalation without explicit binding to admissibility conditions. A worked example in clinical decision-support pipelines illustrates how semantic artifacts can escalate in authority without structural constraint.</p> <p>To demonstrate feasibility, the paper introduces a minimal <strong>authority lattice</strong> model for constraining semantic escalation via promotion tokens and partial order enforcement. The aim is not to mechanize moral legitimacy, but to formalize enforceable subsets of continuation structure. Governance, in this framework, becomes a candidate invariant class subject to partial formalization under structural pressure.</p> <p>SMP is presented as a diagnostic and predictive systems principle. It does not claim inevitability or full mechanization of governance. Rather, it offers an architectural lens for identifying when voluntary discipline collapses under autonomy and economic consequence, signaling pressure for invariant descent. The work situates itself within systems theory traditions including least privilege, information flow lattices, and temporal invariants, extending those trajectories toward semantic and authority-level constraints in AI systems.</p> |
| title | The Substrate Migration Principle: How Computing Advances by Enforcing Invariants Below the Application Layer |
| topic | Substrate Migration Principle invariant descent systems architecture formal methods authority lattice semantic escalation unauthorized continuation AI governance agentic systems information flow least privilege epistemic systems substrate enforcement partial formalization reliability theory |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18726868 |