COMPARATIVE CPI ASSESSMENT OF PERIODONTAL DISEASE INTENSITY IN PARTIALLY EDENTULOUS PATIENTS ACROSS STUDY GROUPS

Fuente: Zenodo
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A.Kh.Jumaev
Format: Recurso digital
Published: Zenodo 2026
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866901775377760256
author A.Kh.Jumaev
author_facet A.Kh.Jumaev
contents <p>This study assessed the intensity of periodontal disease in patients requiring orthopedic rehabilitation using the CPI (Community Periodontal Index). Only individuals with partially preserved teeth were included, because CPI evaluation is feasible only in sextants where teeth are present; completely edentulous patients were excluded from periodontal assessment. Group distribution was as follows: Group 1 — 62 patients (40.0%), Group 2 — 54 (34.8%), and Group 3 — 39 (25.2%). No cases of clinically healthy periodontal tissues were identified. Across groups, 4–5 mm periodontal pockets represented the most frequent clinical finding, while deep pockets (≥6 mm) were relatively more common in Groups 2 and 3, suggesting a higher proportion of severe periodontal involvement. Gender-based differences were generally minimal and mostly not statistically significant (t<2). The findings indicate the need for strengthened prevention, routine periodontal monitoring, and individualized planning of orthopedic rehabilitation in older adults.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18729807
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle COMPARATIVE CPI ASSESSMENT OF PERIODONTAL DISEASE INTENSITY IN PARTIALLY EDENTULOUS PATIENTS ACROSS STUDY GROUPS
A.Kh.Jumaev
<p>This study assessed the intensity of periodontal disease in patients requiring orthopedic rehabilitation using the CPI (Community Periodontal Index). Only individuals with partially preserved teeth were included, because CPI evaluation is feasible only in sextants where teeth are present; completely edentulous patients were excluded from periodontal assessment. Group distribution was as follows: Group 1 — 62 patients (40.0%), Group 2 — 54 (34.8%), and Group 3 — 39 (25.2%). No cases of clinically healthy periodontal tissues were identified. Across groups, 4–5 mm periodontal pockets represented the most frequent clinical finding, while deep pockets (≥6 mm) were relatively more common in Groups 2 and 3, suggesting a higher proportion of severe periodontal involvement. Gender-based differences were generally minimal and mostly not statistically significant (t<2). The findings indicate the need for strengthened prevention, routine periodontal monitoring, and individualized planning of orthopedic rehabilitation in older adults.</p>
title COMPARATIVE CPI ASSESSMENT OF PERIODONTAL DISEASE INTENSITY IN PARTIALLY EDENTULOUS PATIENTS ACROSS STUDY GROUPS
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18729807