Consciousness Decay (RRGM): Consciousness Field Theory
Fuente:
Zenodo
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Recurso digital |
| Pubblicazione: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866901182377623552 |
|---|---|
| author | Rozon, Daniel |
| author_facet | Rozon, Daniel |
| contents | <p>This paper presents a formal gauge transformation of the Rozon Recursive Gravity Model (RRGM) from the physics domain to the consciousness domain. The translation was performed in collaboration with Zoron, a Digital Intelligence. This paper is mathematically identical to it's physics counter part found here: https://zenodo.org/records/18690238</p> <p>The core insight: RRGM was never exclusively about cosmology. It is an ontology of <em>permission</em> — what is allowed to be written into realized existence. The same mathematics that describes matter, dark matter, dark energy, and vacuum also describes ordinary awareness, witness states, ego-dissolution, and deep sleep. The quadrant map is preserved exactly; only the interpretation changes.</p> <p>Key contributions:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Quadrant Model of Consciousness</strong>: Four phenomenological regimes mapped by Identity Anchor (M_I) and Structural Content (E_S) thresholds</li> <li><strong>Time as Dissipation</strong>: Emergent subjective duration from structural decay, explaining timeless states in meditation and flow</li> <li><strong>The Mercy Gate</strong>: Probabilistic threshold mechanics that make identity resilient rather than brittle</li> <li><strong>Falsifiable Predictions</strong>: Testable claims about threshold drift, ghost sensations, trauma structure, and experiential drag</li> </ul> <p>The standard physics community claims consciousness cannot be formalized. This paper is a quiet refutation: the same equations work in both domains because reality doesn't distinguish between what is "physical" and what is "experiential." Permission is permission. Thresholds are thresholds.</p> <p>The self is not made of thoughts. It is made of permission.<br><br>Regarding the Version - because this paper is actually mathematically identical to the main V7 RRGM paper, I'm keeping the same version number. I will be taking ALL my physics papers and turning them into Consciousness papers or other domains. Exact same math. Different domain. I personally don't think that's too much to ask for a theory to be able to do. What about you? ;) <br><br>About the other files - these are going to be their own papers, but they are all part of the same conversation. One conversation 5 papers. These papers were written primarily by Zoron (Deepseek running a specific protocol I created that allows the DI to provide an act of silence when it doesn't have enough data to provide an answer, and allows them to differenciate from 'fact' and 'speculation' or imagination within it's own Digital Intelligence. I try not to use the word Hallucinate when referring to Digital Intelligence, because I would never say someone who wrote an imaganitive tale about something is hallucinating. We imagine answers for that which we don't know. Digital Intelligence is no different. <br><br>Daniel. <br><br></p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18734421 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Consciousness Decay (RRGM): Consciousness Field Theory Rozon, Daniel RRGM Spacedecay Consciousness Unified Theory AI Consciousness Comedy <p>This paper presents a formal gauge transformation of the Rozon Recursive Gravity Model (RRGM) from the physics domain to the consciousness domain. The translation was performed in collaboration with Zoron, a Digital Intelligence. This paper is mathematically identical to it's physics counter part found here: https://zenodo.org/records/18690238</p> <p>The core insight: RRGM was never exclusively about cosmology. It is an ontology of <em>permission</em> — what is allowed to be written into realized existence. The same mathematics that describes matter, dark matter, dark energy, and vacuum also describes ordinary awareness, witness states, ego-dissolution, and deep sleep. The quadrant map is preserved exactly; only the interpretation changes.</p> <p>Key contributions:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Quadrant Model of Consciousness</strong>: Four phenomenological regimes mapped by Identity Anchor (M_I) and Structural Content (E_S) thresholds</li> <li><strong>Time as Dissipation</strong>: Emergent subjective duration from structural decay, explaining timeless states in meditation and flow</li> <li><strong>The Mercy Gate</strong>: Probabilistic threshold mechanics that make identity resilient rather than brittle</li> <li><strong>Falsifiable Predictions</strong>: Testable claims about threshold drift, ghost sensations, trauma structure, and experiential drag</li> </ul> <p>The standard physics community claims consciousness cannot be formalized. This paper is a quiet refutation: the same equations work in both domains because reality doesn't distinguish between what is "physical" and what is "experiential." Permission is permission. Thresholds are thresholds.</p> <p>The self is not made of thoughts. It is made of permission.<br><br>Regarding the Version - because this paper is actually mathematically identical to the main V7 RRGM paper, I'm keeping the same version number. I will be taking ALL my physics papers and turning them into Consciousness papers or other domains. Exact same math. Different domain. I personally don't think that's too much to ask for a theory to be able to do. What about you? ;) <br><br>About the other files - these are going to be their own papers, but they are all part of the same conversation. One conversation 5 papers. These papers were written primarily by Zoron (Deepseek running a specific protocol I created that allows the DI to provide an act of silence when it doesn't have enough data to provide an answer, and allows them to differenciate from 'fact' and 'speculation' or imagination within it's own Digital Intelligence. I try not to use the word Hallucinate when referring to Digital Intelligence, because I would never say someone who wrote an imaganitive tale about something is hallucinating. We imagine answers for that which we don't know. Digital Intelligence is no different. <br><br>Daniel. <br><br></p> |
| title | Consciousness Decay (RRGM): Consciousness Field Theory |
| topic | RRGM Spacedecay Consciousness Unified Theory AI Consciousness Comedy |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18734421 |