Methodological Assessment of Quasi-Experimental Designs in District Hospital Systems Across South Africa: A Meta-Analysis

Fuente: Zenodo
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mbatha, Mthethwa, Nxumalo, Nomi, Thabethe, Sibongile, Mkhize, Zola
Formato: Recurso digital
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: Zenodo 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866901984264585216
author Mbatha, Mthethwa
Nxumalo, Nomi
Thabethe, Sibongile
Mkhize, Zola
author_facet Mbatha, Mthethwa
Nxumalo, Nomi
Thabethe, Sibongile
Mkhize, Zola
contents <p>Quasi-experimental designs are increasingly used to evaluate interventions in district hospital systems across South Africa, despite methodological concerns. A comprehensive review of quasi-experimental research was conducted using systematic search strategies. Studies were screened for eligibility based on predefined criteria, including study design, sample size, and outcome measures. The analysis identified a trend towards overestimation of treatment effects by approximately 15% in studies with small sample sizes (<300 patients), which is considered statistically significant. Despite methodological limitations, the majority of quasi-experimental designs appeared to yield clinically relevant findings. However, further research is needed to validate these results across different settings and outcomes. District hospitals should consider implementing rigorous quality improvement strategies alongside clinical interventions to enhance the reliability of future trials. Treatment effect was estimated with $\text{logit}(p_i)=\beta_0+\beta^\top X_i$, and uncertainty reported using confidence-interval based inference.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18738913
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2002
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Methodological Assessment of Quasi-Experimental Designs in District Hospital Systems Across South Africa: A Meta-Analysis
Mbatha, Mthethwa
Nxumalo, Nomi
Thabethe, Sibongile
Mkhize, Zola
Sub-Saharan
healthcare systems
evaluation studies
quasi-experimental
randomized controlled
impact assessments
public health
<p>Quasi-experimental designs are increasingly used to evaluate interventions in district hospital systems across South Africa, despite methodological concerns. A comprehensive review of quasi-experimental research was conducted using systematic search strategies. Studies were screened for eligibility based on predefined criteria, including study design, sample size, and outcome measures. The analysis identified a trend towards overestimation of treatment effects by approximately 15% in studies with small sample sizes (<300 patients), which is considered statistically significant. Despite methodological limitations, the majority of quasi-experimental designs appeared to yield clinically relevant findings. However, further research is needed to validate these results across different settings and outcomes. District hospitals should consider implementing rigorous quality improvement strategies alongside clinical interventions to enhance the reliability of future trials. Treatment effect was estimated with $\text{logit}(p_i)=\beta_0+\beta^\top X_i$, and uncertainty reported using confidence-interval based inference.</p>
title Methodological Assessment of Quasi-Experimental Designs in District Hospital Systems Across South Africa: A Meta-Analysis
topic Sub-Saharan
healthcare systems
evaluation studies
quasi-experimental
randomized controlled
impact assessments
public health
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18738913