CP Violation in Beauty Baryons: Geometric Origins of the Mass Hierarchy
Fuente:
Zenodo
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Recurso digital |
| Publicado: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866901221714952192 |
|---|---|
| author | Niedzwiecki, K. T. |
| author_facet | Niedzwiecki, K. T. |
| contents | <p>We predicted that beauty baryons should exhibit CP asymmetries at the few-percent level, based on a geometric scaling framework in which quark compactness—measured by the Compton wavelength—governs sensitivity to matter–antimatter asymmetry. The LHCb collaboration subsequently reported <span>$A_{CP} = (2.45 \pm 0.46 \pm 0.10)\%$</span> in <span>$\Lambda_b$</span> decays, consistent with this prediction. The same framework, with a single derived scaling exponent (<span>$D_{geo} \approx 3.618$</span>), previously accounted for vector meson decay width suppression across three orders of magnitude in mass (<span>$\beta = 3.87$</span>, consistent with the geometric prediction) and strangeness-dependent suppression in the baryon decuplet.</p> <p>The exponent is not fitted to data; it arises from the spectral geometry of icosahedral quasicrystalline structures. We present four falsifiable predictions distinguishing this framework from standard CKM phenomenology. The decisive test is charm baryons: the geometric framework requires uniformly small asymmetries (~0.1–0.2%) across all charm baryon channels, while CKM phenomenology permits percent-level effects in specific channels. Belle II and upgraded LHCb will resolve this.</p> <p><strong>Keywords:</strong> CP violation, baryon decays, LHCb, geometric permeability, Compton wavelength, quasicrystal geometry, beauty baryons, charm baryons, CKM matrix, icosahedral projection</p> <p>Correspondence: niedzkatie@gmail.com</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18765889 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | CP Violation in Beauty Baryons: Geometric Origins of the Mass Hierarchy Niedzwiecki, K. T. CP violation LHCb beauty baryons vacuum chirality modified gravity baryon asymmetry particle physics phenomenology geometric impedance <p>We predicted that beauty baryons should exhibit CP asymmetries at the few-percent level, based on a geometric scaling framework in which quark compactness—measured by the Compton wavelength—governs sensitivity to matter–antimatter asymmetry. The LHCb collaboration subsequently reported <span>$A_{CP} = (2.45 \pm 0.46 \pm 0.10)\%$</span> in <span>$\Lambda_b$</span> decays, consistent with this prediction. The same framework, with a single derived scaling exponent (<span>$D_{geo} \approx 3.618$</span>), previously accounted for vector meson decay width suppression across three orders of magnitude in mass (<span>$\beta = 3.87$</span>, consistent with the geometric prediction) and strangeness-dependent suppression in the baryon decuplet.</p> <p>The exponent is not fitted to data; it arises from the spectral geometry of icosahedral quasicrystalline structures. We present four falsifiable predictions distinguishing this framework from standard CKM phenomenology. The decisive test is charm baryons: the geometric framework requires uniformly small asymmetries (~0.1–0.2%) across all charm baryon channels, while CKM phenomenology permits percent-level effects in specific channels. Belle II and upgraded LHCb will resolve this.</p> <p><strong>Keywords:</strong> CP violation, baryon decays, LHCb, geometric permeability, Compton wavelength, quasicrystal geometry, beauty baryons, charm baryons, CKM matrix, icosahedral projection</p> <p>Correspondence: niedzkatie@gmail.com</p> |
| title | CP Violation in Beauty Baryons: Geometric Origins of the Mass Hierarchy |
| topic | CP violation LHCb beauty baryons vacuum chirality modified gravity baryon asymmetry particle physics phenomenology geometric impedance |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18765889 |