| _version_ | 1866901461895479296 |
|---|---|
| author | Foxx, Phileas |
| author_facet | Foxx, Phileas |
| contents | <p>Pre-emptive responses to the 25 most likely objections to Conscious Geometry Theory (CGT), from "Isn't this just numerology?" and "How is this different from Eddington?" through to "Why should anyone listen to an independent researcher?" Each objection is stated in its strongest form and answered with specific evidence, citations, or honest acknowledgement of limitations. Covers: parameter counting, overfitting concerns, the numerology base rate audit, comparison to prior attempts (Eddington, Koide), the role of the golden ratio, consciousness claims, lack of institutional affiliation, the δ parameter problem, domain applicability boundaries, and the r tension.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18771486 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Conscious Geometry Theory - FAQ and Anticipated Objections Foxx, Phileas Physics - General Physics Philosophy - Philosophy of Science <p>Pre-emptive responses to the 25 most likely objections to Conscious Geometry Theory (CGT), from "Isn't this just numerology?" and "How is this different from Eddington?" through to "Why should anyone listen to an independent researcher?" Each objection is stated in its strongest form and answered with specific evidence, citations, or honest acknowledgement of limitations. Covers: parameter counting, overfitting concerns, the numerology base rate audit, comparison to prior attempts (Eddington, Koide), the role of the golden ratio, consciousness claims, lack of institutional affiliation, the δ parameter problem, domain applicability boundaries, and the r tension.</p> |
| title | Conscious Geometry Theory - FAQ and Anticipated Objections |
| topic | Physics - General Physics Philosophy - Philosophy of Science |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18771486 |