Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18771486 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- <p>Pre-emptive responses to the 25 most likely objections to Conscious Geometry Theory (CGT), from "Isn't this just numerology?" and "How is this different from Eddington?" through to "Why should anyone listen to an independent researcher?" Each objection is stated in its strongest form and answered with specific evidence, citations, or honest acknowledgement of limitations. Covers: parameter counting, overfitting concerns, the numerology base rate audit, comparison to prior attempts (Eddington, Koide), the role of the golden ratio, consciousness claims, lack of institutional affiliation, the δ parameter problem, domain applicability boundaries, and the r tension.</p>