FIDUCIARY DUTIES OF SUPERVISORY BOARD MEMBERS AND DIRECTORS IN STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES AS A DETERMINANT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE EFFECTIVENESS

Fuente: Zenodo
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Tashmatov, Rustam
Formato: Recurso digital
Publicado: Zenodo 2026
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866901342284414976
author Tashmatov, Rustam
author_facet Tashmatov, Rustam
contents <p><span>This study examines the economic and governance implications of fiduciary duties imposed on supervisory board members and directors of state-owned enterprises (SOEs). The paper conceptualizes fiduciary duties as an institutional mechanism designed to mitigate agency conflicts, align managerial incentives, and enhance asset management efficiency. Particular attention is paid to conflict-of-interest risks, accountability structures, and the interaction between public objectives and corporate decision-making. The analysis demonstrates that the effectiveness of fiduciary regulation depends not only on formal legal codification but also on the practical delineation of discretion, liability, and governance safeguards. The findings contribute to the understanding of fiduciary governance models in transitional and state-influenced corporate systems.</span></p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18780181
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle FIDUCIARY DUTIES OF SUPERVISORY BOARD MEMBERS AND DIRECTORS IN STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES AS A DETERMINANT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE EFFECTIVENESS
Tashmatov, Rustam
<p><span>This study examines the economic and governance implications of fiduciary duties imposed on supervisory board members and directors of state-owned enterprises (SOEs). The paper conceptualizes fiduciary duties as an institutional mechanism designed to mitigate agency conflicts, align managerial incentives, and enhance asset management efficiency. Particular attention is paid to conflict-of-interest risks, accountability structures, and the interaction between public objectives and corporate decision-making. The analysis demonstrates that the effectiveness of fiduciary regulation depends not only on formal legal codification but also on the practical delineation of discretion, liability, and governance safeguards. The findings contribute to the understanding of fiduciary governance models in transitional and state-influenced corporate systems.</span></p>
title FIDUCIARY DUTIES OF SUPERVISORY BOARD MEMBERS AND DIRECTORS IN STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES AS A DETERMINANT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE EFFECTIVENESS
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18780181