Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18820763 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- <p>Contemporary debates on artificial intelligence primarily focus on automation, labor displacement, ethics, and existential risk. This paper advances a different claim: artificial intelligence represents the first large-scale externalization of instrumental rationality itself. Unlike prior technological revolutions that amplified physical force, mechanical production, process automation, or informational coordination, AI increasingly performs means–end optimization, prediction, and strategic recommendation. As instrumental rationality becomes progressively automated, the productivity-centered telos of modern civilization destabilizes.</p> <p><span>This structural shift does not eliminate human struggle but relocates it. Economic necessity becomes gradually decentered as the primary organizing principle of life, opening what is here termed a secular eschatological horizon: an immanent, non-deterministic reorientation toward human fulfillment beyond survival. Drawing on historical analysis and philosophical dialogue with Hegel, Marx, Weber, Nietzsche, and Arendt, and integrating insights from capabilities theory (Nussbaum, 2011), critical theory of acceleration (Rosa, 2019), and non-Western contemplative traditions, the paper argues that the future of human flourishing depends less on technological sophistication than on the cultivation of capacities irreducible to optimization—meaning attribution, moral responsibility, relational presence, and existential orientation. The transition is gradual and conditional. Automation expands freedom but does not guarantee elevation.</span></p>