Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Recurso digital |
| Lenguaje: | gallego |
| Publicado: |
Zenodo
2012
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18826686 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Tabla de Contenidos:
- <p>Nasal vowels and palatal nasals are two phonetic features that are amalgamated in mediaeval spell- ing, giving rise to ambiguous or contradictory inter- pretations and (de)codings by the reader or editor of such texts. The supralinear stroke, or tilde, besides being the standard indicator of abbreviations (hence its common designation as a general abbreviation mark), is also used as a graphemic component with a diacritic function to represent nasal vowels and palatal nasal, differentiating between the simple graphemes <a>, <n> and the complex graphemes <ã>, <ñ>. The present article approaches these facts from a critical perspective, raising issues concerning orthography, phonetics and ‘literary criticism’, with two purposes in mind. One is to assess the tilde’s functions and relevance of these to the internal de- velopment of Galician in the medieval period; the other, to discuss, and question if need be, traditional editorial criteria for critical editions of medieval texts, taking into account the analysis of the usus scribendi detected in the text.</p>