| _version_ | 1866901818924072960 |
|---|---|
| author | Soni, Navneet |
| author_facet | Soni, Navneet |
| contents | <p>Abstract<br>The prevailing academic culture continues to place journal branding and indexing ahead of the real impact of<br>research. However, the value of a scientific contribution should be measured by the extent to which it is quoted,<br>discussed, and built upon, not by where it is published. This mini-review argues that peer review, including on<br>the basis of articles published in journals indexed by Google Scholar or Copernicus, should be recognized in<br>academic evaluation systems.<br>Key words<br>Impact factor; Index; Scopus; Web of Science; Google Scholar; Index Copernicus; Citation-index; I-Index</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18837555 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Citation Counts, Not Journal Branding, Should Guide Academic Recognition Soni, Navneet Impact factor; Index; Scopus; Web of Science; Google Scholar; Index Copernicus; Citation-index; I-Index <p>Abstract<br>The prevailing academic culture continues to place journal branding and indexing ahead of the real impact of<br>research. However, the value of a scientific contribution should be measured by the extent to which it is quoted,<br>discussed, and built upon, not by where it is published. This mini-review argues that peer review, including on<br>the basis of articles published in journals indexed by Google Scholar or Copernicus, should be recognized in<br>academic evaluation systems.<br>Key words<br>Impact factor; Index; Scopus; Web of Science; Google Scholar; Index Copernicus; Citation-index; I-Index</p> |
| title | Citation Counts, Not Journal Branding, Should Guide Academic Recognition |
| topic | Impact factor; Index; Scopus; Web of Science; Google Scholar; Index Copernicus; Citation-index; I-Index |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18837555 |