Methodological Evaluation of Public Health Surveillance Systems in Uganda Using Difference-in-Differences Models for Measuring Risk Reduction Over Time

Fuente: Zenodo
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kazibbykonye, David
Formato: Recurso digital
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: Zenodo 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866901216499335168
author Kazibbykonye, David
author_facet Kazibbykonye, David
contents <p>Public health surveillance systems are crucial for monitoring disease outbreaks in developing countries like Uganda. A difference-in-differences (DID) model was employed to assess the impact of surveillance enhancements on disease incidence, with pre- and post-intervention data from selected districts. The DID model revealed a statistically significant decrease in measles cases by 30% (p < 0.05), suggesting effective risk reduction strategies implemented. The use of DID models provided robust evidence for the impact of surveillance improvements on disease incidence, contributing to better public health outcomes. Further studies should be conducted across more districts and with additional disease types to validate these findings. Treatment effect was estimated with $\text{logit}(p_i)=\beta_0+\beta^\top X_i$, and uncertainty reported using confidence-interval based inference.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18842282
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2007
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Methodological Evaluation of Public Health Surveillance Systems in Uganda Using Difference-in-Differences Models for Measuring Risk Reduction Over Time
Kazibbykonye, David
Sub-Saharan
surveillance
DID model
evaluation
public health
methodology
analytical frameworks
<p>Public health surveillance systems are crucial for monitoring disease outbreaks in developing countries like Uganda. A difference-in-differences (DID) model was employed to assess the impact of surveillance enhancements on disease incidence, with pre- and post-intervention data from selected districts. The DID model revealed a statistically significant decrease in measles cases by 30% (p < 0.05), suggesting effective risk reduction strategies implemented. The use of DID models provided robust evidence for the impact of surveillance improvements on disease incidence, contributing to better public health outcomes. Further studies should be conducted across more districts and with additional disease types to validate these findings. Treatment effect was estimated with $\text{logit}(p_i)=\beta_0+\beta^\top X_i$, and uncertainty reported using confidence-interval based inference.</p>
title Methodological Evaluation of Public Health Surveillance Systems in Uganda Using Difference-in-Differences Models for Measuring Risk Reduction Over Time
topic Sub-Saharan
surveillance
DID model
evaluation
public health
methodology
analytical frameworks
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18842282