Reliability Assessment of Public Health Surveillance Systems in Ghana: A Randomized Field Trial

Fuente: Zenodo
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Darko, Ama, Agyeman, Kofi, Asare, Yaw
Format: Recurso digital
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Zenodo 2007
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866901990053773312
author Darko, Ama
Agyeman, Kofi
Asare, Yaw
author_facet Darko, Ama
Agyeman, Kofi
Asare, Yaw
contents <p>Public health surveillance systems are critical for monitoring infectious diseases in developing countries like Ghana. However, their reliability and effectiveness have not been thoroughly evaluated. A randomized field trial was conducted with 100 healthcare facilities across Ghana, randomly assigned into two groups: intervention (enhanced surveillance) and control (standard surveillance). System reliability was measured by analysing data from both groups over a six-month period. Statistical models were used to assess system performance. The analysis revealed that the enhanced surveillance group had an 85% higher detection rate of infectious diseases compared to the standard group, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for this difference. This study demonstrated that enhancing public health surveillance systems can significantly improve their reliability in detecting and responding to infectious disease outbreaks. The findings suggest potential improvements in system design and resource allocation. Healthcare facilities should prioritise the implementation of enhanced surveillance systems, including training for staff on new protocols and investment in necessary infrastructure. Treatment effect was estimated with $\text{logit}(p_i)=\beta_0+\beta^\top X_i$, and uncertainty reported using confidence-interval based inference.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18842436
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2007
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Reliability Assessment of Public Health Surveillance Systems in Ghana: A Randomized Field Trial
Darko, Ama
Agyeman, Kofi
Asare, Yaw
Sub-Saharan
Geographic Information Systems
Sampling
Validation
Evaluation
Randomization
Surveillance
<p>Public health surveillance systems are critical for monitoring infectious diseases in developing countries like Ghana. However, their reliability and effectiveness have not been thoroughly evaluated. A randomized field trial was conducted with 100 healthcare facilities across Ghana, randomly assigned into two groups: intervention (enhanced surveillance) and control (standard surveillance). System reliability was measured by analysing data from both groups over a six-month period. Statistical models were used to assess system performance. The analysis revealed that the enhanced surveillance group had an 85% higher detection rate of infectious diseases compared to the standard group, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for this difference. This study demonstrated that enhancing public health surveillance systems can significantly improve their reliability in detecting and responding to infectious disease outbreaks. The findings suggest potential improvements in system design and resource allocation. Healthcare facilities should prioritise the implementation of enhanced surveillance systems, including training for staff on new protocols and investment in necessary infrastructure. Treatment effect was estimated with $\text{logit}(p_i)=\beta_0+\beta^\top X_i$, and uncertainty reported using confidence-interval based inference.</p>
title Reliability Assessment of Public Health Surveillance Systems in Ghana: A Randomized Field Trial
topic Sub-Saharan
Geographic Information Systems
Sampling
Validation
Evaluation
Randomization
Surveillance
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18842436