Methodological Evaluation of Public Health Surveillance Systems in Uganda: A Randomized Field Trial for Clinical Outcomes Assessment

Fuente: Zenodo
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Okello, Gabriel
Formato: Recurso digital
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: Zenodo 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866901688641650688
author Okello, Gabriel
author_facet Okello, Gabriel
contents <p>Public health surveillance systems are crucial for monitoring disease prevalence and guiding public health interventions. In Uganda, such systems have been implemented but their effectiveness in measuring clinical outcomes remains under scrutiny. A stratified random sampling design was employed to select two districts for this study. A mixed-method approach combining quantitative data from electronic health records and qualitative insights from healthcare providers was used to assess the system's accuracy in reporting clinical outcomes. The analysis revealed a significant misclassification rate of 20% in reported fever incidence, indicating potential discrepancies in disease surveillance. This study underscores the need for methodological improvements in Uganda's public health surveillance systems to enhance their reliability in capturing clinical data accurately. Immediate steps should include refining diagnostic criteria and standardising reporting protocols to improve data quality and consistency. Public Health Surveillance, Clinical Outcomes, Randomized Field Trial, Uganda Treatment effect was estimated with $\text{logit}(p_i)=\beta_0+\beta^\top X_i$, and uncertainty reported using confidence-interval based inference.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18903619
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2010
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Methodological Evaluation of Public Health Surveillance Systems in Uganda: A Randomized Field Trial for Clinical Outcomes Assessment
Okello, Gabriel
Sub-Saharan
Public Health
Surveillance
Randomization
Evaluation
Impact
Community Engagement
<p>Public health surveillance systems are crucial for monitoring disease prevalence and guiding public health interventions. In Uganda, such systems have been implemented but their effectiveness in measuring clinical outcomes remains under scrutiny. A stratified random sampling design was employed to select two districts for this study. A mixed-method approach combining quantitative data from electronic health records and qualitative insights from healthcare providers was used to assess the system's accuracy in reporting clinical outcomes. The analysis revealed a significant misclassification rate of 20% in reported fever incidence, indicating potential discrepancies in disease surveillance. This study underscores the need for methodological improvements in Uganda's public health surveillance systems to enhance their reliability in capturing clinical data accurately. Immediate steps should include refining diagnostic criteria and standardising reporting protocols to improve data quality and consistency. Public Health Surveillance, Clinical Outcomes, Randomized Field Trial, Uganda Treatment effect was estimated with $\text{logit}(p_i)=\beta_0+\beta^\top X_i$, and uncertainty reported using confidence-interval based inference.</p>
title Methodological Evaluation of Public Health Surveillance Systems in Uganda: A Randomized Field Trial for Clinical Outcomes Assessment
topic Sub-Saharan
Public Health
Surveillance
Randomization
Evaluation
Impact
Community Engagement
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18903619