Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Language: | |
| Published: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18916784 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866901883629600768 |
|---|---|
| author | Altic, Aladin Arnautovic, Jelena Grosso, Domenic Kuong, Sebastian |
| author_facet | Altic, Aladin Arnautovic, Jelena Grosso, Domenic Kuong, Sebastian |
| contents | <p>We report the case of a 27-year-old male with morbid obesity (BMI 60) and advanced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, EF 10%) who presented in cardiogenic shock and subsequently developed an acute inferior–lateral ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). His management required complex hemodynamic monitoring, emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and repeated right heart catheterizations (RHC). Despite profound comorbidities and an extremely poor clinical prognosis, guideline-directed therapy resulted in significant hemodynamic improvement. The patient ultimately recovered, underwent ICD implantation without complication, and was discharged in stable condition has been following for one year and doing well. This case highlights the critical role of invasive hemodynamic assessment in advanced HF, the limitations of noninvasive devices such as Vigileo in morbid obesity, and the value of coordinated multidisciplinary care.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18916784 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | When Vigilance Requires a Catheter: Evaluating the Challenges of Vigileo Monitoring Versus Invasive Hemodynamics in Cardiogenic Shock in a Community Setting Altic, Aladin Arnautovic, Jelena Grosso, Domenic Kuong, Sebastian <p>We report the case of a 27-year-old male with morbid obesity (BMI 60) and advanced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, EF 10%) who presented in cardiogenic shock and subsequently developed an acute inferior–lateral ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). His management required complex hemodynamic monitoring, emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and repeated right heart catheterizations (RHC). Despite profound comorbidities and an extremely poor clinical prognosis, guideline-directed therapy resulted in significant hemodynamic improvement. The patient ultimately recovered, underwent ICD implantation without complication, and was discharged in stable condition has been following for one year and doing well. This case highlights the critical role of invasive hemodynamic assessment in advanced HF, the limitations of noninvasive devices such as Vigileo in morbid obesity, and the value of coordinated multidisciplinary care.</p> |
| title | When Vigilance Requires a Catheter: Evaluating the Challenges of Vigileo Monitoring Versus Invasive Hemodynamics in Cardiogenic Shock in a Community Setting |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18916784 |