When Wars Begin in the Mind: Inferential Escalation, the R-Index, and Preventive Conflict.
Fuente:
Zenodo
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866901892430299136 |
|---|---|
| author | FRANCOIS, MAILLOT |
| author_facet | FRANCOIS, MAILLOT |
| contents | <p><strong>Why do some international crises escalate into war while others remain stable despite similar levels of tension?</strong> This article proposes a formal explanation based on the stability of the <strong>interpretive environment</strong> in which strategic actors evaluate ambiguous signals.</p> <p>Building on previous work on intentional inflation and strategic inference under uncertainty, the paper introduces a dimensionless <strong>escalation index (<span>$R$</span>)</strong>:</p> <div> <div>$$R = \frac{\alpha L q}{1-q}$$</div> </div> <p>Where:</p> <ul> <li> <p><strong><span>$q$</span></strong> represents prior hostility assumptions.</p> </li> <li> <p><strong><span>$\alpha$</span></strong> represents narrative amplification.</p> </li> <li> <p><strong><span>$L$</span></strong> represents the interpretive leverage assigned to observed signals.</p> </li> </ul> <p>The model identifies a <strong>critical threshold</strong> separating two regimes of strategic interpretation. When <span>$R < 1$</span>, ambiguity remains proportionally interpreted and the inferential environment remains stable. When <span>$R > 1$</span>, ambiguous signals are increasingly processed as evidence of concealed hostile intent, producing a self-reinforcing escalation dynamic.</p> <p>The framework bridges insights from misperception theory, signaling theory, and Bayesian inference. Its logic is illustrated through a comparative analysis of three major crises:</p> <ol> <li> <p><strong>The July Crisis of 1914</strong> (<span>$R > 1$</span>: systemic instability).</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>The Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962</strong> (<span>$R < 1$</span>: managed discipline).</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>The Iraq War of 2003</strong> (<span>$R > 1$</span>: narrative-driven escalation).</p> </li> </ol> <p>The central implication is that strategic stability depends not only on material capabilities, but also on <strong>inferential discipline</strong>—the ability to resist transforming uncertainty into premature certainty.</p> <p>This preprint is part of a broader research program on strategic inference under uncertainty and accompanies related theoretical, methodological, and replication materials.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18941114 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | When Wars Begin in the Mind: Inferential Escalation, the R-Index, and Preventive Conflict. FRANCOIS, MAILLOT strategic inference, inferential escalation, intentional inflation, international relations, crisis escalation, Bayesian inference, misperception, security dilemma, preventive war, interpretive stability, narrative amplification inférence stratégique, escalade inférentielle, inflation intentionnelle, relations internationales, escalade de crise, inférence bayésienne, mésinterprétation, dilemme de sécurité, guerre préventive, stabilité interprétative, amplification narrative <p><strong>Why do some international crises escalate into war while others remain stable despite similar levels of tension?</strong> This article proposes a formal explanation based on the stability of the <strong>interpretive environment</strong> in which strategic actors evaluate ambiguous signals.</p> <p>Building on previous work on intentional inflation and strategic inference under uncertainty, the paper introduces a dimensionless <strong>escalation index (<span>$R$</span>)</strong>:</p> <div> <div>$$R = \frac{\alpha L q}{1-q}$$</div> </div> <p>Where:</p> <ul> <li> <p><strong><span>$q$</span></strong> represents prior hostility assumptions.</p> </li> <li> <p><strong><span>$\alpha$</span></strong> represents narrative amplification.</p> </li> <li> <p><strong><span>$L$</span></strong> represents the interpretive leverage assigned to observed signals.</p> </li> </ul> <p>The model identifies a <strong>critical threshold</strong> separating two regimes of strategic interpretation. When <span>$R < 1$</span>, ambiguity remains proportionally interpreted and the inferential environment remains stable. When <span>$R > 1$</span>, ambiguous signals are increasingly processed as evidence of concealed hostile intent, producing a self-reinforcing escalation dynamic.</p> <p>The framework bridges insights from misperception theory, signaling theory, and Bayesian inference. Its logic is illustrated through a comparative analysis of three major crises:</p> <ol> <li> <p><strong>The July Crisis of 1914</strong> (<span>$R > 1$</span>: systemic instability).</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>The Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962</strong> (<span>$R < 1$</span>: managed discipline).</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>The Iraq War of 2003</strong> (<span>$R > 1$</span>: narrative-driven escalation).</p> </li> </ol> <p>The central implication is that strategic stability depends not only on material capabilities, but also on <strong>inferential discipline</strong>—the ability to resist transforming uncertainty into premature certainty.</p> <p>This preprint is part of a broader research program on strategic inference under uncertainty and accompanies related theoretical, methodological, and replication materials.</p> |
| title | When Wars Begin in the Mind: Inferential Escalation, the R-Index, and Preventive Conflict. |
| topic | strategic inference, inferential escalation, intentional inflation, international relations, crisis escalation, Bayesian inference, misperception, security dilemma, preventive war, interpretive stability, narrative amplification inférence stratégique, escalade inférentielle, inflation intentionnelle, relations internationales, escalade de crise, inférence bayésienne, mésinterprétation, dilemme de sécurité, guerre préventive, stabilité interprétative, amplification narrative |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18941114 |