Methodological Evaluation and Panel-Data Estimation for Yield Improvement in Ethiopia's Public Health Surveillance Systems: A Systematic Review

Fuente: Zenodo
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Getachew, Tewodros, Abebe, Meklit
Formato: Recurso digital
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: Zenodo 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866901763896901632
author Getachew, Tewodros
Abebe, Meklit
author_facet Getachew, Tewodros
Abebe, Meklit
contents <p>{ "background": "Public health surveillance systems are critical for disease control and resource allocation. In Ethiopia, evaluating the yield improvement of these systems requires robust methodological approaches, particularly those utilising longitudinal data to account for temporal and spatial heterogeneity.", "purpose and objectives": "This systematic review aims to critically evaluate the methodological approaches used in the literature to assess yield improvement in Ethiopia's public health surveillance systems, with a specific focus on the application and rigour of panel-data estimation techniques.", "methodology": "A systematic search of multiple electronic databases was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies were screened against pre-defined inclusion criteria focusing on methodological design. Data were extracted on study characteristics, statistical models, estimation techniques, and reported measures of uncertainty. The quality of methodological application was appraised using a custom tool.", "findings": "Of the 27 included studies, a predominant theme was the use of two-way fixed effects models, specified as $Y{it} = \\beta X{it} + \\alphai + \\lambdat + \\epsilon_{it}$, where $i$ and $t$ index districts and years, respectively. However, only 33% reported robust standard errors or conducted sensitivity analyses for key model assumptions. The direction of association between integrated surveillance interventions and yield was consistently positive, though the magnitude of reported effects varied considerably.", "conclusion": "The application of panel-data methods for evaluating surveillance yield in Ethiopia is increasing but remains methodologically inconsistent. A lack of reporting on inference robustness and diagnostic testing limits the reliability of many published estimates.", "recommendations": "Future research should prioritise the use of more flexible panel-data estimators, rigorously report diagnostic tests for model assumptions, and explicitly quantify uncertainty using confidence intervals. Capacity building in advanced econometric techniques for public health researchers is urgently needed.", "key words": "surveillance systems, yield, panel data, fixed effects, econometric evaluation, methodology, health systems", "contribution statement": "This review provides the first formal methodological critique of panel-data</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18954774
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2007
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Methodological Evaluation and Panel-Data Estimation for Yield Improvement in Ethiopia's Public Health Surveillance Systems: A Systematic Review
Getachew, Tewodros
Abebe, Meklit
public health surveillance
Ethiopia
Sub-Saharan Africa
panel data
yield improvement
methodological evaluation
health systems research
<p>{ "background": "Public health surveillance systems are critical for disease control and resource allocation. In Ethiopia, evaluating the yield improvement of these systems requires robust methodological approaches, particularly those utilising longitudinal data to account for temporal and spatial heterogeneity.", "purpose and objectives": "This systematic review aims to critically evaluate the methodological approaches used in the literature to assess yield improvement in Ethiopia's public health surveillance systems, with a specific focus on the application and rigour of panel-data estimation techniques.", "methodology": "A systematic search of multiple electronic databases was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies were screened against pre-defined inclusion criteria focusing on methodological design. Data were extracted on study characteristics, statistical models, estimation techniques, and reported measures of uncertainty. The quality of methodological application was appraised using a custom tool.", "findings": "Of the 27 included studies, a predominant theme was the use of two-way fixed effects models, specified as $Y{it} = \\beta X{it} + \\alphai + \\lambdat + \\epsilon_{it}$, where $i$ and $t$ index districts and years, respectively. However, only 33% reported robust standard errors or conducted sensitivity analyses for key model assumptions. The direction of association between integrated surveillance interventions and yield was consistently positive, though the magnitude of reported effects varied considerably.", "conclusion": "The application of panel-data methods for evaluating surveillance yield in Ethiopia is increasing but remains methodologically inconsistent. A lack of reporting on inference robustness and diagnostic testing limits the reliability of many published estimates.", "recommendations": "Future research should prioritise the use of more flexible panel-data estimators, rigorously report diagnostic tests for model assumptions, and explicitly quantify uncertainty using confidence intervals. Capacity building in advanced econometric techniques for public health researchers is urgently needed.", "key words": "surveillance systems, yield, panel data, fixed effects, econometric evaluation, methodology, health systems", "contribution statement": "This review provides the first formal methodological critique of panel-data</p>
title Methodological Evaluation and Panel-Data Estimation for Yield Improvement in Ethiopia's Public Health Surveillance Systems: A Systematic Review
topic public health surveillance
Ethiopia
Sub-Saharan Africa
panel data
yield improvement
methodological evaluation
health systems research
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18954774