A Comparative Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Industrial Machinery Fleet Reliability in Ethiopia, 2000–2026
Fuente:
Zenodo
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Recurso digital |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| Publicado: |
Zenodo
2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866901887547080704 |
|---|---|
| author | Assefa, Meklit Getachew, Tewodros Tadesse, Saron |
| author_facet | Assefa, Meklit Getachew, Tewodros Tadesse, Saron |
| contents | <p>{ "background": "Industrial machinery fleet reliability is a critical determinant of productivity and economic growth in developing economies. In the context of Ethiopia, systematic, longitudinal evaluations of reliability interventions for such fleets are scarce, limiting evidence-based asset management.", "purpose and objectives": "This study aims to methodologically evaluate the application of a difference-in-differences (DiD) model for quantifying the causal impact of a national preventive maintenance programme on the operational reliability of industrial machinery fleets. It compares outcomes between treated and control fleets over an extended period.", "methodology": "A comparative DiD analysis was conducted using panel data from machinery fleets in the cement and textile manufacturing sectors. The core statistical model is $Y{it} = \\beta0 + \\beta1 \\text{Treat}i + \\beta2 \\text{Post}t + \\delta (\\text{Treat}i \\cdot \\text{Post}t) + \\epsilon{it}$, where $Y{it}$ is the monthly reliability index. Inference is based on cluster-robust standard errors at the fleet level.", "findings": "The analysis indicates a statistically significant positive treatment effect. The DiD estimator, $\\delta$, shows that the programme increased the mean reliability index by 17.3 percentage points (95% CI: 12.1 to 22.5). The parallel trends assumption, tested using lead variables, was not violated.", "conclusion": "The DiD framework provides a robust methodological approach for isolating the causal effect of engineering interventions on fleet reliability in an observational setting. The significant positive result underscores the efficacy of structured preventive maintenance.", "recommendations": "Policymakers and industrial asset managers should adopt quasi-experimental evaluation designs like DiD for programme assessment. The preventive maintenance protocol studied should be considered for broader national rollout, with continuous data collection to refine the model.", "key words": "difference-in-differences; machinery reliability; preventive maintenance; causal inference; industrial engineering</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18964870 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | A Comparative Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Industrial Machinery Fleet Reliability in Ethiopia, 2000–2026 Assefa, Meklit Getachew, Tewodros Tadesse, Saron Difference-in-differences Industrial machinery reliability Fleet management Sub-Saharan Africa Longitudinal analysis Maintenance engineering Developing economies <p>{ "background": "Industrial machinery fleet reliability is a critical determinant of productivity and economic growth in developing economies. In the context of Ethiopia, systematic, longitudinal evaluations of reliability interventions for such fleets are scarce, limiting evidence-based asset management.", "purpose and objectives": "This study aims to methodologically evaluate the application of a difference-in-differences (DiD) model for quantifying the causal impact of a national preventive maintenance programme on the operational reliability of industrial machinery fleets. It compares outcomes between treated and control fleets over an extended period.", "methodology": "A comparative DiD analysis was conducted using panel data from machinery fleets in the cement and textile manufacturing sectors. The core statistical model is $Y{it} = \\beta0 + \\beta1 \\text{Treat}i + \\beta2 \\text{Post}t + \\delta (\\text{Treat}i \\cdot \\text{Post}t) + \\epsilon{it}$, where $Y{it}$ is the monthly reliability index. Inference is based on cluster-robust standard errors at the fleet level.", "findings": "The analysis indicates a statistically significant positive treatment effect. The DiD estimator, $\\delta$, shows that the programme increased the mean reliability index by 17.3 percentage points (95% CI: 12.1 to 22.5). The parallel trends assumption, tested using lead variables, was not violated.", "conclusion": "The DiD framework provides a robust methodological approach for isolating the causal effect of engineering interventions on fleet reliability in an observational setting. The significant positive result underscores the efficacy of structured preventive maintenance.", "recommendations": "Policymakers and industrial asset managers should adopt quasi-experimental evaluation designs like DiD for programme assessment. The preventive maintenance protocol studied should be considered for broader national rollout, with continuous data collection to refine the model.", "key words": "difference-in-differences; machinery reliability; preventive maintenance; causal inference; industrial engineering</p> |
| title | A Comparative Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Industrial Machinery Fleet Reliability in Ethiopia, 2000–2026 |
| topic | Difference-in-differences Industrial machinery reliability Fleet management Sub-Saharan Africa Longitudinal analysis Maintenance engineering Developing economies |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18964870 |