A Randomised Field Trial for the Cost-Effectiveness Diagnostics of Manufacturing Systems in Ethiopia
Fuente:
Zenodo
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Zenodo
2019
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866901929780576256 |
|---|---|
| author | Getachew, Tewodros Tesfaye, Selamawit Abebe, Meklit Tadesse, Yonas |
| author_facet | Getachew, Tewodros Tesfaye, Selamawit Abebe, Meklit Tadesse, Yonas |
| contents | <p>{ "background": "Manufacturing systems in developing economies often lack robust, field-validated methods for cost-effectiveness diagnostics. Existing evaluation frameworks are typically derived from high-income contexts and may not account for local operational constraints and resource availability.", "purpose and objectives": "This study aimed to develop and empirically test a novel, randomised field trial methodology for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic interventions in manufacturing plants. The primary objective was to determine the causal impact of a structured diagnostic protocol on operational cost reduction.", "methodology": "A randomised controlled trial was conducted across a sample of manufacturing facilities. Plants were randomly assigned to a treatment group receiving the diagnostic intervention or a control group. Cost data were collected pre- and post-intervention. The primary analysis used a difference-in-differences model: $C{it} = \\alpha + \\beta1 (Treati \\times Postt) + \\beta2 X{it} + \\epsilon_{it}$, where $C$ is cost, with inference based on cluster-robust standard errors.", "findings": "The diagnostic intervention significantly reduced average monthly operational costs by 18.2% (95% CI: 12.5% to 23.9%, p<0.01) in treatment plants relative to controls. The most substantial savings were identified in energy consumption and raw material waste streams.", "conclusion": "The randomised field trial provides a rigorous methodological framework for cost-effectiveness evaluation in industrial settings. The applied diagnostic protocol demonstrated a statistically and economically significant positive impact.", "recommendations": "Manufacturing enterprises should adopt structured diagnostic evaluations informed by field-trial evidence. Policymakers and engineering practitioners should prioritise interventions targeting energy and material efficiency.", "key words": "randomised controlled trial, industrial diagnostics, cost-effectiveness, operational efficiency, manufacturing systems", "contribution statement": "This paper provides the first application of a randomised field trial methodology to evaluate engineering diagnostics in an industrial context, generating a novel dataset of causal evidence on cost-reduction interventions</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_18972274 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | A Randomised Field Trial for the Cost-Effectiveness Diagnostics of Manufacturing Systems in Ethiopia Getachew, Tewodros Tesfaye, Selamawit Abebe, Meklit Tadesse, Yonas manufacturing systems cost-effectiveness analysis randomised controlled trial Sub-Saharan Africa industrial diagnostics field trial developing economies <p>{ "background": "Manufacturing systems in developing economies often lack robust, field-validated methods for cost-effectiveness diagnostics. Existing evaluation frameworks are typically derived from high-income contexts and may not account for local operational constraints and resource availability.", "purpose and objectives": "This study aimed to develop and empirically test a novel, randomised field trial methodology for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic interventions in manufacturing plants. The primary objective was to determine the causal impact of a structured diagnostic protocol on operational cost reduction.", "methodology": "A randomised controlled trial was conducted across a sample of manufacturing facilities. Plants were randomly assigned to a treatment group receiving the diagnostic intervention or a control group. Cost data were collected pre- and post-intervention. The primary analysis used a difference-in-differences model: $C{it} = \\alpha + \\beta1 (Treati \\times Postt) + \\beta2 X{it} + \\epsilon_{it}$, where $C$ is cost, with inference based on cluster-robust standard errors.", "findings": "The diagnostic intervention significantly reduced average monthly operational costs by 18.2% (95% CI: 12.5% to 23.9%, p<0.01) in treatment plants relative to controls. The most substantial savings were identified in energy consumption and raw material waste streams.", "conclusion": "The randomised field trial provides a rigorous methodological framework for cost-effectiveness evaluation in industrial settings. The applied diagnostic protocol demonstrated a statistically and economically significant positive impact.", "recommendations": "Manufacturing enterprises should adopt structured diagnostic evaluations informed by field-trial evidence. Policymakers and engineering practitioners should prioritise interventions targeting energy and material efficiency.", "key words": "randomised controlled trial, industrial diagnostics, cost-effectiveness, operational efficiency, manufacturing systems", "contribution statement": "This paper provides the first application of a randomised field trial methodology to evaluate engineering diagnostics in an industrial context, generating a novel dataset of causal evidence on cost-reduction interventions</p> |
| title | A Randomised Field Trial for the Cost-Effectiveness Diagnostics of Manufacturing Systems in Ethiopia |
| topic | manufacturing systems cost-effectiveness analysis randomised controlled trial Sub-Saharan Africa industrial diagnostics field trial developing economies |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18972274 |