Strict Liability under POCSO Act: Boon or Burden?

Fuente: Zenodo
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Adamya, Bhardwaj, Archana, Vashisht
Format: Recurso digital
Publié: Zenodo 2026
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866901062655410176
author Adamya, Bhardwaj
Archana, Vashisht
author_facet Adamya, Bhardwaj
Archana, Vashisht
contents <p><span>The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) represents a landmark legislative response to the growing incidence of sexual offences against children in India. One of its most debated features is the incorporation of the principle of strict liability, particularly with respect to offences involving sexual acts with minors, where consent and mens rea are rendered legally irrelevant. This research paper critically examines whether strict liability under the POCSO Act operates as a necessary protective mechanism (a boon) or results in disproportionate and unjust outcomes (a burden). By analysing statutory provisions, judicial interpretations, and practical implications, the paper seeks to evaluate the effectiveness and fairness of strict liability within the broader framework of criminal justice and child protection...</span></p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19018933
institution Zenodo
language
publishDate 2026
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Strict Liability under POCSO Act: Boon or Burden?
Adamya, Bhardwaj
Archana, Vashisht
POCSO Act
Strict Liability
Child Sexual Offences
Mens Rea
Criminal Justice
Consent
<p><span>The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) represents a landmark legislative response to the growing incidence of sexual offences against children in India. One of its most debated features is the incorporation of the principle of strict liability, particularly with respect to offences involving sexual acts with minors, where consent and mens rea are rendered legally irrelevant. This research paper critically examines whether strict liability under the POCSO Act operates as a necessary protective mechanism (a boon) or results in disproportionate and unjust outcomes (a burden). By analysing statutory provisions, judicial interpretations, and practical implications, the paper seeks to evaluate the effectiveness and fairness of strict liability within the broader framework of criminal justice and child protection...</span></p>
title Strict Liability under POCSO Act: Boon or Burden?
topic POCSO Act
Strict Liability
Child Sexual Offences
Mens Rea
Criminal Justice
Consent
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19018933