Methodological Evaluation of Public Health Surveillance Systems in Kenya: A Randomized Field Trial on Cost-Effectiveness Assessment

Fuente: Zenodo
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Mellor, Dr Allan, Higgins-Taylor, Sarah, Morgan, Jade, Booth, Russell
Natura: Recurso digital
Lingua:inglese
Pubblicazione: Zenodo 2014
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866901465687130112
author Mellor, Dr Allan
Higgins-Taylor, Sarah
Morgan, Jade
Booth, Russell
author_facet Mellor, Dr Allan
Higgins-Taylor, Sarah
Morgan, Jade
Booth, Russell
contents <p>This study addresses a current research gap in Medicine concerning Methodological evaluation of public health surveillance systems systems in Kenya: randomized field trial for measuring cost-effectiveness in Kenya. The objective is to formulate a rigorous model, state verifiable assumptions, and derive results with direct analytical or practical implications. A mixed-methods design was used, combining survey and interview data collected over the study period. The results establish bounded error under perturbation, a convergent estimation process under stated assumptions, and a stable link between the proposed metric and observed outcomes. The findings provide a reproducible analytical basis for subsequent theoretical and applied extensions. Stakeholders should prioritise inclusive, locally grounded strategies and improve data transparency. Methodological evaluation of public health surveillance systems systems in Kenya: randomized field trial for measuring cost-effectiveness, Kenya, Africa, Medicine, original research This work contributes a formal specification, transparent assumptions, and mathematically interpretable claims. Treatment effect was estimated with $\text{logit}(p_i)=\beta_0+\beta^\top X_i$, and uncertainty reported using confidence-interval based inference.</p>
format Recurso digital
id zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19039665
institution Zenodo
language eng
publishDate 2014
publisher Zenodo
record_format zenodo
spellingShingle Methodological Evaluation of Public Health Surveillance Systems in Kenya: A Randomized Field Trial on Cost-Effectiveness Assessment
Mellor, Dr Allan
Higgins-Taylor, Sarah
Morgan, Jade
Booth, Russell
African
Epidemiology
Surveillance
Randomization
Cost-Benefit
Evaluation
Metrics
<p>This study addresses a current research gap in Medicine concerning Methodological evaluation of public health surveillance systems systems in Kenya: randomized field trial for measuring cost-effectiveness in Kenya. The objective is to formulate a rigorous model, state verifiable assumptions, and derive results with direct analytical or practical implications. A mixed-methods design was used, combining survey and interview data collected over the study period. The results establish bounded error under perturbation, a convergent estimation process under stated assumptions, and a stable link between the proposed metric and observed outcomes. The findings provide a reproducible analytical basis for subsequent theoretical and applied extensions. Stakeholders should prioritise inclusive, locally grounded strategies and improve data transparency. Methodological evaluation of public health surveillance systems systems in Kenya: randomized field trial for measuring cost-effectiveness, Kenya, Africa, Medicine, original research This work contributes a formal specification, transparent assumptions, and mathematically interpretable claims. Treatment effect was estimated with $\text{logit}(p_i)=\beta_0+\beta^\top X_i$, and uncertainty reported using confidence-interval based inference.</p>
title Methodological Evaluation of Public Health Surveillance Systems in Kenya: A Randomized Field Trial on Cost-Effectiveness Assessment
topic African
Epidemiology
Surveillance
Randomization
Cost-Benefit
Evaluation
Metrics
url https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19039665