ZLT-P81: The Koinonic Scaffolding – SLCC: The Structural Law that Predicts and Explains Voluntary Cooperation Collapse
Fuente:
Zenodo
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso digital |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866901386579410944 |
|---|---|
| author | Yubi Dagogliano, Danny |
| author_facet | Yubi Dagogliano, Danny |
| contents | <p dir="auto"><strong>Why do voluntary collective contributions collapse even when everyone wants to cooperate?</strong></p> <p dir="auto"><strong>Structural answer (not preferences):</strong> the <strong>Structural Law of Collective Contribution (SLCC.T1)</strong> proves that sustained contribution C(t) ≥ c* is admissible <strong>only if three structural conditions hold simultaneously</strong>:</p> <ul> <li><strong>κ ≥ κ_min</strong> (structural buffer)</li> <li><strong>K > 0</strong> (kenotic plasticity)</li> <li><strong>Π > 0</strong> (pistis coherence)</li> </ul> <p dir="auto"><strong>Key novelties:</strong></p> <ul> <li>First formal derivation of ZLC (P72) into the public-goods domain</li> <li><strong>Three pure failure pathways</strong> that are exhaustive (CM-001 Idolatry, CM-002 Pharisee, CM-003 Atomization) — no fourth mode exists (P78)</li> <li><strong>Four ordinal falsifiable predictions</strong> (two novel)</li> <li><strong>Strong Grade A empirical support</strong> from four decades of VCM experiments (Herrmann 2008, Gürerk 2006, Ostrom, Dal Bó & Fréchette)</li> </ul> <p dir="auto"><strong>This is not a preference model. It is a structural law.</strong> Operational audit protocol <strong>IAS-COOP</strong> included (Appendix A).</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19069650 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | ZLT-P81: The Koinonic Scaffolding – SLCC: The Structural Law that Predicts and Explains Voluntary Cooperation Collapse Yubi Dagogliano, Danny <p dir="auto"><strong>Why do voluntary collective contributions collapse even when everyone wants to cooperate?</strong></p> <p dir="auto"><strong>Structural answer (not preferences):</strong> the <strong>Structural Law of Collective Contribution (SLCC.T1)</strong> proves that sustained contribution C(t) ≥ c* is admissible <strong>only if three structural conditions hold simultaneously</strong>:</p> <ul> <li><strong>κ ≥ κ_min</strong> (structural buffer)</li> <li><strong>K > 0</strong> (kenotic plasticity)</li> <li><strong>Π > 0</strong> (pistis coherence)</li> </ul> <p dir="auto"><strong>Key novelties:</strong></p> <ul> <li>First formal derivation of ZLC (P72) into the public-goods domain</li> <li><strong>Three pure failure pathways</strong> that are exhaustive (CM-001 Idolatry, CM-002 Pharisee, CM-003 Atomization) — no fourth mode exists (P78)</li> <li><strong>Four ordinal falsifiable predictions</strong> (two novel)</li> <li><strong>Strong Grade A empirical support</strong> from four decades of VCM experiments (Herrmann 2008, Gürerk 2006, Ostrom, Dal Bó & Fréchette)</li> </ul> <p dir="auto"><strong>This is not a preference model. It is a structural law.</strong> Operational audit protocol <strong>IAS-COOP</strong> included (Appendix A).</p> |
| title | ZLT-P81: The Koinonic Scaffolding – SLCC: The Structural Law that Predicts and Explains Voluntary Cooperation Collapse |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19069650 |