Emergence of Flavor Mixing, CKM Hierarchy, and CP Violation from a Resonant Brane Model (ERB) – Preprint & Stability Proof
Fuente:
Zenodo
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Recurso digital |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| Publicado: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866902330363871232 |
|---|---|
| author | Speckmann, Daniel |
| author_facet | Speckmann, Daniel |
| contents | <p><strong>The Standard Model has 19 free parameters. We don't know why they have the values they do. They are just measured and inserted.</strong></p> <p>The ERB model shows that at least the flavour sector — the part that governs how quarks mix and how heavy they are — is not random. It is geometry.</p> <p><strong>What we proved:</strong></p> <p>The universe chose exactly three quark generations because three is the only number that allows a non-planar triangle in a resonance space quantised by Bessel zeros. Two generations would give a flat line — no CP violation, no matter.</p> <p>The CP violation parameter J — the tiny asymmetry that made matter survive the Big Bang — is not a free parameter. It is the area of that triangle. You cannot set it to zero without making the triangle collapse.</p> <p>The up/down asymmetry between quarks — why the down quark is heavier than the up quark, why the bottom quark is heavier than the strange — is not random either. It follows from exactly half a unit of isospin. Not approximately half. Exactly half, proven to 0.000% precision.</p> <p>And now v9: the mass hierarchy itself has a Jarlskog invariant. Just as J_CKM measures the asymmetry of mixing, J_mass measures the asymmetry of mass generation. Both are zero if the universe is symmetric. Both are non-zero for the same reason — because δ = ½.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19108584 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | Emergence of Flavor Mixing, CKM Hierarchy, and CP Violation from a Resonant Brane Model (ERB) – Preprint & Stability Proof Speckmann, Daniel Emergent gauge symmetry, CKM matrix, CP violation, Jarlskog invariant, U(1) x SU(2) x SU(3), Resonant Brane Model, Flavor Clock, Whip effect, topological modes, quantum field theory, lattice simulation, numerical validation emergent gauge symmetry CKM matrix CP violation Jarlkog invariant quantum field theory <p><strong>The Standard Model has 19 free parameters. We don't know why they have the values they do. They are just measured and inserted.</strong></p> <p>The ERB model shows that at least the flavour sector — the part that governs how quarks mix and how heavy they are — is not random. It is geometry.</p> <p><strong>What we proved:</strong></p> <p>The universe chose exactly three quark generations because three is the only number that allows a non-planar triangle in a resonance space quantised by Bessel zeros. Two generations would give a flat line — no CP violation, no matter.</p> <p>The CP violation parameter J — the tiny asymmetry that made matter survive the Big Bang — is not a free parameter. It is the area of that triangle. You cannot set it to zero without making the triangle collapse.</p> <p>The up/down asymmetry between quarks — why the down quark is heavier than the up quark, why the bottom quark is heavier than the strange — is not random either. It follows from exactly half a unit of isospin. Not approximately half. Exactly half, proven to 0.000% precision.</p> <p>And now v9: the mass hierarchy itself has a Jarlskog invariant. Just as J_CKM measures the asymmetry of mixing, J_mass measures the asymmetry of mass generation. Both are zero if the universe is symmetric. Both are non-zero for the same reason — because δ = ½.</p> |
| title | Emergence of Flavor Mixing, CKM Hierarchy, and CP Violation from a Resonant Brane Model (ERB) – Preprint & Stability Proof |
| topic | Emergent gauge symmetry, CKM matrix, CP violation, Jarlskog invariant, U(1) x SU(2) x SU(3), Resonant Brane Model, Flavor Clock, Whip effect, topological modes, quantum field theory, lattice simulation, numerical validation emergent gauge symmetry CKM matrix CP violation Jarlkog invariant quantum field theory |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19108584 |