LLM Exposure Monitoring: Platform Openness, Recording Depth, and the Case for an Open Standard
Fuente:
Zenodo
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Recurso digital |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| Publicado: |
Zenodo
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866901640762621952 |
|---|---|
| author | Alex, Li |
| author_facet | Alex, Li |
| contents | <p>Prior work on AI agent accountability, notably the AEGIS framework, focused on recording agent actions. This paper addresses a complementary problem: recording agent exposure—what data AI agents access, ingest, and transmit across heterogeneous platforms. We formalize the LLM Exposure Surface (Read, Write, API, and Context Exposure), define an Exposure Threat Model (ET1–ET5) grounded in empirical incidents, and introduce a Platform Openness Taxonomy classifying platforms into three recording depth tiers based on webhook and API capabilities. We show that variation in recording depth is primarily a platform strategy issue, not a technical limitation. We propose Open Recording Patterns, a standardized exposure event schema extending AEGIS L1, and illustrate the framework through a dual-stream corroboration architecture that cross-references agent-reported events against platform-verified events. Classification of 13 platforms reveals that only 4 (31%) currently support full real-time exposure monitoring.</p> |
| format | Recurso digital |
| id | zenodo_https___doi_org_10_5281_zenodo_19112061 |
| institution | Zenodo |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Zenodo |
| record_format | zenodo |
| spellingShingle | LLM Exposure Monitoring: Platform Openness, Recording Depth, and the Case for an Open Standard Alex, Li AI governance LLM exposure agent accountability platform openness recording depth open standard regulatory compliance exposure monitoring AEGIS <p>Prior work on AI agent accountability, notably the AEGIS framework, focused on recording agent actions. This paper addresses a complementary problem: recording agent exposure—what data AI agents access, ingest, and transmit across heterogeneous platforms. We formalize the LLM Exposure Surface (Read, Write, API, and Context Exposure), define an Exposure Threat Model (ET1–ET5) grounded in empirical incidents, and introduce a Platform Openness Taxonomy classifying platforms into three recording depth tiers based on webhook and API capabilities. We show that variation in recording depth is primarily a platform strategy issue, not a technical limitation. We propose Open Recording Patterns, a standardized exposure event schema extending AEGIS L1, and illustrate the framework through a dual-stream corroboration architecture that cross-references agent-reported events against platform-verified events. Classification of 13 platforms reveals that only 4 (31%) currently support full real-time exposure monitoring.</p> |
| title | LLM Exposure Monitoring: Platform Openness, Recording Depth, and the Case for an Open Standard |
| topic | AI governance LLM exposure agent accountability platform openness recording depth open standard regulatory compliance exposure monitoring AEGIS |
| url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19112061 |